To: txrangerette; Sacajaweau; stlnative; commish
Here is an odd observation.
Let's assume that this isn't the guy, and he's just a loon who wishes he was. We know that he is obsessed with the case. He's spent four years conversing with Tracey. He's probably tracked down every little tidbit of info available. He's most likely read every book and watched every documentary on the subject. So, if he wants to take credit for this, why is he giving details that can be confirmed to be wrong by the information that's available to anyone?
157 posted on
08/20/2006 10:08:35 AM PDT by
Conservative Texan Mom
(Some people say I'm stubborn, when it's usually just that I'm right.)
To: Conservative Texan Mom
You're point is extremely well put. Rationally, he would not make deliberately incorrect statements if he really wanted "credit" for the crime. Only thing I can think of...he's now quite confused and is acting as more than one personality, or has severe memory problems or something. The multiple personality thing has been mentioned as a possibility.
162 posted on
08/20/2006 12:43:43 PM PDT by
txrangerette
("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson