I don't question that the judge would be reasonable to remind the attorneys that the accuser's medical records are not for public consumptiom at this stage of the process.
But the way he did it -- if this was his reason -- was more than a little unusual. Don't you think so?
Sure, but not because it was said in chambers. It's a weird instruction, period. It "is", but "not quite". There's a lot of wiggle room. Titus's intent isn't clear, nor are the parameters. Murky. I hate that. Spit or kick the spitoon.