[I want to know]

In post 175 of this same thread, I posted a document concerning the Durham County Case Management Schedule (I forget how to link to a post). If you refer to the July 17, 2006 schedule on page 2 and 3, it lists the defendants in the motion to quash, and their lawyers. I see no Duke representation, however, maybe there is a hearing at a later date.

Of course, Duke could have already complied with the card swipe requests and the players were there to protest against the address request. There were 36 of the players represented at the hearing on Monday for the motion to quash. Are those 36 only ones Nifong wanted subpoenas for?

[Locomotive Breath]

So I agree that the players have an interest in quashing the release of their own records. IOW, if Nifong wanted their childhood immunization records I suppose it would be the players responsibility to quash the subpoena which would be directed a their pediatrician (c.f. Rush Limbaugh's medical records). I'm just thinking now that Duke will comply and not attempt to defend the students on their own grounds.

[maggief]

IIRC, during the recent hearing Osborn mentioned there were 49 names on the list.