Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Administration Quitely Plans NAFTA Super Highway
Human Events ^ | 6/16/06 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 06/25/2006 8:40:04 AM PDT by o_zarkman44

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-186 next last
To: TLI

Wow, a link to a WEBSITE.


101 posted on 06/25/2006 1:24:10 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
I just can't help but see a super highway subject to be used by hostile forces that leads right to the heart of America.

Perhaps I spent too much time reading books from The Military Book Club in my youth.

102 posted on 06/25/2006 1:24:47 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
I just can't help but see a super highway subject to be used by hostile forces that leads right to the heart of America.

Let me make sure I understand this.

Building another road will greatly increase the chances of attack from eskimos or the mighty army of Honduras.

That's what you're worried about?

103 posted on 06/25/2006 1:33:31 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Ya know, I'd bet that before those hostile forces got very far up or down that Super Highway we would bomb the you know what out of them. Care to join me in the bet? Of course, first, help me figure out how a sizable hostile force could position itself to get started there in the first place?

Could the reference be to terrorists using the super highway, rather than a standing army? If so, what do terrorists need with a super highway? The way they infiltrate and hide and bomb and run away or blow themselves up wouldn't change because of THAT.

Good grief!!!


104 posted on 06/25/2006 1:41:55 PM PDT by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

It's nice to see a voice of reason like yours on a Corsi thread.

That's kinda rare.

After all, THEY ARE PLANNING TO BUILD A ROAD!!!

It's the end of America, sovereignty, and it will lead to ugly people raping our babies.

And that's just the start!


105 posted on 06/25/2006 1:49:03 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

And thus begins the official demise of the United States...


106 posted on 06/25/2006 1:50:33 PM PDT by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
That's what you're worried about?

That you see no potential threat from a superhighway, not just "another road", passing for hundreds of miles through another country to eventually connect to the middle of America is...unusual...IMO. I guess where I see military strategy you see...what exactly? Skepticism? Belief in the good nature of your fellow man? Ignoring the possibility will make it not happen?
Do you remember how effeciently German troops were moved on the Autobahn? Do you remember how fast our troops moved on the Autobahn once we controlled it? WWII mobilized forces were turtles compared to today's mechanized warfare.

Control the highway, just like a river, and you cut America in two. The Mississippi pretty much did that for years. Now a road will.
Sorry, Bro, scoff all you want, I've gotta express it. It looks bad from a defensive aspect.

107 posted on 06/25/2006 2:12:44 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

If the survival of America teeters on a whether we can control one steenkin' road within our own country, then we are complete pussies and should surrender to whomever you think the NWO is right now.


108 posted on 06/25/2006 2:22:43 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

My, what a rejoinder. I feel dumber already from having read it.


109 posted on 06/25/2006 2:24:21 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

LOL. It sounds like the idea is to beat the union-caused bottlenecks at the Left Coast ports.


110 posted on 06/25/2006 2:25:06 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philman_36; Dog Gone

Quite frankly, I feel more of threat from the eminent domain issuess surrounding the highway than I do from the highway itself.


111 posted on 06/25/2006 2:25:53 PM PDT by dirtboy (When Bush is on the same side as Ted the Swimmer on an issue, you know he's up to no good...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Quite frankly, I feel more of threat from the eminent domain issuess surrounding the highway than I do from the highway itself.
Because it's the more immediate threat.
112 posted on 06/25/2006 2:27:25 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; expat_panama; Mase; nopardons

Another Corsi thread. This one is more entertaining than the first. A real "twister."


113 posted on 06/25/2006 2:31:42 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

114 posted on 06/25/2006 2:37:59 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Get 'R Done

Hope they build it a little higher than the last one


115 posted on 06/25/2006 2:44:27 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
My, what a rejoinder. I feel dumber already from having read it.

I'll bypass the easy response.

We already have lots of roads that go to our borders and beyond.

Please explain why another one is a grave new threat. I especially want to hear about why armies from Central America will suddenly find it easier to attack us in our heartland.

116 posted on 06/25/2006 2:46:22 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Please explain why another one is a grave new threat.
No strategy knowledge, no logistics understanding...did you never serve in the military?
I especially want to hear about why armies from Central America will suddenly find it easier to attack us in our heartland.
Why does it have to be just an army from Central America? Couldn't some other nation's army use it? Neutral countries have been crossed before against their will. Many times, in fact, throughout history.
117 posted on 06/25/2006 2:58:07 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: deport
Gosh lots of roads headed north towards the Canadian Border and the fruited plains... Here's three more proposals to go along with the Corsi worry. Wonder which ones will be built, if ever?


Ports-To-Plains


La-Entrada_Al-Pacifico


118 posted on 06/25/2006 3:00:15 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: deport
La-Entrada_Al-Pacifico
How fitting in light of the conversation...The Pacific Entrance.
119 posted on 06/25/2006 3:06:18 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Okay, gotcha. No new roads in this country because some foreign army might use them.


120 posted on 06/25/2006 3:06:49 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson