Joe Cheshire, a defense attorney for Duke University lacrosse players at the center of a rape investigation, said the latest tests show no conclusive match to any of the lacrosse players' DNA. (ABC News
Posted on 05/13/2006 9:30:51 AM PDT by SkyPilot
May 13, 2006 — The second round of DNA test results in the Duke University rape investigation show "no conclusive match'' to any lacrosse players, defense attorneys said, but a vaginal swab of the alleged rape victim produced DNA from a "single male source'' — a man not on the lacrosse team who did not attend a March 13 party that was the site of the alleged rape.
Joe Cheshire, a defense attorney for Duke University lacrosse players at the center of a rape investigation, said the latest tests show no conclusive match to any of the lacrosse players' DNA. (ABC News
Defense attorney Joe Chesire declined to identify the mystery man or his connection to the alleged victim, but ABC News' Law and Justice Unit has learned that the unnamed source of the DNA is the alleged victim's "boyfriend," according to her mother.
ABC News is withholding the name of the man because he is apparently not a target of the investigation. Records indicate that Durham, N.C., police gave the "boyfriend'' a cheek swab to collect DNA on May 3, ABC News' Law and Justice Unit has learned exclusively.
It is unclear if or how the first DNA tests missed what appears to be the only foreign genetic material found on the alleged victim's body, defense attorneys said. Two Duke lacrosse players were indicted more than two weeks before the cheek swab was taken from the "boyfriend."
It is also unclear whether the alleged victim had sex with the "boyfriend" the night she claims to have been raped by three Duke lacrosse players. DNA experts tell ABC News that genetic traces of semen can remain in the body up to six days after intercouse.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
"Thanks, but I was the semen outside of her vagina on her body as well...."
Please turn yourself in.
Took me a year after moving here to not startle and look for my "safe" spot whenever there was "movement".
No one ever counters that in those cases without incriminating DNA that the perp is known to the victim, there is physical evidence, someone has a record, etc.
Possibly the boy friend? Why are we thinking that?
Lavonia Allison
E. LAVONIA lNGRAM ALLISON
Lavonia Allison
lol. NO, no. My husband still has some major geek photos of stuff he and his UC Davis pals did. It's geeky stuff. They loved it. They cherish the photos. Still talk geek to each other.
No, it doesn't change that at all. I'm getting the strong impression, if you will, it is possible the FA "had" to do this thing in order to avoid "something else". That impression is now stronger than ever.
I got lost somewhere along the line. Lavonia Allison is a powerfull figure in Durham who seems to control real estate, rentals, etc. Capitol Corp, Am Tobacco project, etc. She influences city gov. I got that much Tell me the connection to the case? Thanks
That was Devilish posting, and he confirmed for me that it was the cousin. Let me know if you want the post #s.
"Bastards" (in the colloquial sense of the word, not the literal) always consider themselves better than the other guy. Doesn't make it so. I have a rule with "bastards": walk away. It really pisses them off. (Can I say that here? Please change to "PO's" them, if necessary, mods.)
Duke "threw" money to the squawking PD. They wanted more. Duke is a business, among other things. There is just so much cash to go around. There is just so much money a business can earmark for non-operating expenses before it jeopardizes itself. Yes, there is a ton of cash in the endowment fund. However, money from the endowment fund can only be distributed per the terms set up when the fund was created. (BTW, not all of the money in the endowment fund goes to Duke or Duke students in the form of financial aid; there are many other organizations and schools that benefit.)
Sounds to me like you're in politics.
Sitting and looking at the ceiling.
Now this makes other "seemingly" past unrelated data about "goings on" in NC make sense. Durham would be a perfect nexus for that type of operation. I'll go digging. Thank you.
I'm beginning to be really embarassed about NC.
Used to be called being on the receiving end of the evil eye.
Now they just call it a.. lol.. CONTACT stun. ;>
Well, I got an interesting study to tell you about... In the 90s, I and some pals did some interviewing of a TON of males from all walks of the various "perspectives". The one thing which was absolutely made clear? Women like these feminists who have sons, raise angry and often violent males. Mama is abusive. Ergo, their sons grow up being angry and... fill in the rest.
We did prison interviews too. Those who were assaultive of females were neatly, consistently raised by anti-male, ball breakers.
There, McKinnon/Dworkin/Bill/Hill Clinton -- there's the result of your feminism -- increasing violence, while platforming on stopping the violence, and encouraging more women to be viscious, so their children could learn from mommy's instructions...
"I was on the upper deck of Candlestick Park for the World Series game."
WOW! I remember seeing that on TV, but never talked to or knew anyone who was there at that moment.
4.0 in HS I didn't know they used a college grading system in High School but then, I'm old. Sure it wasn't 4.0/100??
Wow. You brought back memories of California and the confession of Dan White, which was broadcast on radio for all to hear. I actually felt sorry for the guy.
You know it was just a mistake all along. Dan White's wife sent him out "to get Boloney and Milk, and he thought she said "to get Moscone and Milk".
No thanks,I'll just pull up his page.
One more thing, though, how did Mark Edwards come into this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.