Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flip-Flop In Duke Rape Scandal (Source: Timeline Supports Duke Players)
CBS News ^ | 04/21/06 | staff

Posted on 04/21/2006 8:31:00 AM PDT by Perdogg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last
To: Carolinamom


http://tinyurl.com/hfcvn


161 posted on 04/22/2006 12:00:06 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

If I were the MSM and wanted to take the focus off of something like immigration-an issue on which I was losing-I might try to make a simple case of rowdy students, an untruthful stripper, and prosecutorial misconduct into a nationally significant case of privileged white boys and oppressed black girls. I could always blame the prosecutor for everything if it started looking like I was the bad guy.


162 posted on 04/22/2006 12:18:14 PM PDT by olrtex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

That would be interesting to know, GAgal. Very interesting.

I wonder if these ID's will stand up in court?


163 posted on 04/22/2006 12:50:37 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I was listenning to FNC while putting away the dishes a few minutes ago and what struck me was why a photo array rather than a real lineup?

I would think that a line up would always be preferable to a photo array and it is not like everyone wasn't available? Of course a line-up on TV means the suspects attorney is present. Mabye someone did not want to have attorneys observe her "identification?"


164 posted on 04/22/2006 2:14:01 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

I believe that's exactly what happened. Until I'm informed otherwise on this point, I will assume the worst about the legal ethics and unsavory machinations occurring in the prosecution's side because, so far, those are the characteristics the prosecution has demonstrated.


165 posted on 04/23/2006 12:43:23 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Why wouldn't the DA ask her right away?


166 posted on 04/24/2006 10:35:02 AM PDT by streeeetwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

Girl, you've got some catching up to do. :)


167 posted on 04/28/2006 11:46:50 AM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Seligman's timeline, photos, and evidence just keep getting better and better. He needs to sue this sorry DA and his accuser for malicious prosecution. The DA refused to look at exculpatory evidence. I'd love to see the Seligman and maybe some Duke alums keep Mr. Nifong busy defending a civil suit the next few years. What he did was wrong. What do you expect from a Democrat?


168 posted on 05/03/2006 10:59:01 PM PDT by David Allen (the presumption of innocence - what a concept!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

He campaigned on this case.


169 posted on 05/15/2006 4:31:41 PM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit

Hardin is now a judge

"Originally published in:
The Herald-Sun
Tuesday, April 19, 2005
Edition: Final


BY JOHN STEVENSON jstevenson@heraldsun.com

After an 11-year term of office that brought landmark changes to Durham's legal system, District Attorney Jim Hardin Jr. was named Monday to a special Superior Court judgeship that will require him to preside over civil and criminal cases across the state.

"I'm thrilled," said Hardin, who worked in the DA's office for nearly 10 years before winning his first election as chief prosecutor in 1994.

Hardin's gubernatorial appointment to the judgeship is for five years..."


170 posted on 05/22/2006 12:10:13 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson