Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/24/2005 11:33:24 AM PDT by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ShadowAce; N3WBI3; Tribune7; frogjerk; Salo; LTCJ; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Buck W.; clyde asbury; ...

OSS PING

If you are interested in a new OSS ping list please mail me

2 posted on 06/24/2005 11:35:03 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (I musta taken a wrong turn at 198.182.159.17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3

SCO even implied accusations against BSD (which system is very good for commercial, even closed development). SCO won't be forgiven by enough developers to get much help soon.


6 posted on 06/24/2005 11:43:38 AM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3
We don't necessarily have issues with open source, we just have an issue with open-source technology that includes intellectual property it shouldn't

I seem to remember Darl saying "SCO asserts that the GPL, under which Linux is distributed, violates the United States Constitution and the U.S. copyright and patent laws."

8 posted on 06/24/2005 11:47:00 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3
OpenServer 6 costs $599 for a computer with two users and $1,399 for one with 10 users.

Hmm, how about another commercial UNIX? Mac OS X Server beats the pants off OpenServer, and costs $499 for 10-client, $999 for unlimited client, even cheaper if you buy it with a server.

They are ONLY going to be able to sell this as an upgrade to those who perceive themselves as locked in to their current OpenServer platform.

12 posted on 06/24/2005 11:50:48 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3
Unixware and OpenServer… I haven’t heard of them in many years.

Quite a while back – I’m guessing 1997 or so – you could get freebie versions for personal use (provided you paid a material distribution fee or something). I had used a variety of *BSD operating systems and Solaris, but wanted to try the SCO products and installed each on a couple of machines.

I found them funky, clunky, and “different” compared with everything else I was used to. I just chalked it up to unfamiliarity with their product, but later when talking with someone that had a history of using SCO products daily, he said “no, it’s not you - SCO’s just funky, clunky, and different.”

24 posted on 06/24/2005 12:26:29 PM PDT by Who dat?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3; nobdysfool
SCO has been most prominent recently for its legal attack on IBM, Novell and others regarding its allegation that proprietary Unix software has been improperly moved into open-source Linux. Indeed, one of its targets is AutoZone, a former OpenServer customer.

Ping!

30 posted on 06/24/2005 12:35:48 PM PDT by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3

For stories like this I miss the Eagle :-)


41 posted on 06/24/2005 1:43:54 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson