To: el_doctor2
Oh, you know the standard talking points. It's not a deterrent, it costs more to kill them than it does to keep them in prison, what if an innocent person is executed, it's cruel and unusual, it's just revenge, blah blah blah.
My sister is anti-death penalty. I hear it all the time. I still insist that it is a rather effective deterrent, because the person who is executed is deterred from ever committing another crime again.
Sometimes karma and natural selection just aren't thorough enough.
6 posted on
04/12/2005 6:23:01 PM PDT by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green is made of liberals...)
To: teenyelliott
Ted Bundy hasn't killed any 12-year olds recently.
9 posted on
04/12/2005 6:24:43 PM PDT by
Restorer
To: teenyelliott
I still insist that it is a rather effective deterrent
The above is probably the weakest of all the pro-death penalty arguments. The type of people typically being executed are the sort who rarely think more than 5 minutes ahead. It's really unlikely there's any sort of rational balancing of the punishments vs. the rewards of whatever murder they're committing.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson