A lie? Criminally accountable? What are you talking about?
In February, 2000, Judge Greer signed a court order to remove the feeding tube. Since she was only expected to live for two weeks, she was admitted to a hospice in early March.
Now, what's your problem?
the lie - (where have you been?) on the hospice admitting form in 2000 that Terri was PVS, terminal and not expected to live more than 6 months (a legal requisite for anyone admitted to a hospice in to be terminal with no m ore than 6 month life expectancy) -
In addition, tho' an admitting doctor's name is listed, the doctor DID NOT sign in either space for it - and he left the hospice.
Does this suffice?
Oh, yes - of COURSE she was "expected" to only live 2 weeks - that IS the window for one starved/hydrated to death.
But she was not terminal if she continued to be be given food and water - she was, except for brain damage (NOT PVS!) healthy and had a life expectancy of another 40+ years - which is EXACTLY why michael was able to get such a large settlement in "order to pay for her prolonged therapy."
got a clue yet?