I don't know... I had a hard time following exactly what the situation here with Mae is... and based on my lack of information about it, I wouldn't dare say. I am pretty slow to take internet information and run with it. My main 'agenda' really is that I don't think the public should be involved in these decisions. At some point we have to trust that those near us, and Godforbid, any judge asked to hear our case, will be fair and just.
But that point should not be reached as long as we have someone willing to care for us (assuming no living will to the contrary). The death cult sides with anyone saying "death" even if there are others that say "life - and we will be the caregivers."
If you don't think the public should be involved, then perhaps you are in the wrong thread and commenting on something you didn't mean to comment on? Is that possible?
The key words, well there are so many fo them actually.
You read the first post as we all did. We waited while Freepers checked out the facts and various Freepers did so, and nothing they checed out so far has contradicted the post. Yeah the post is a bit hard to follow, therefore I read it 3 times to make sure I really understood it.
Instead of saying, "I had a hard time following exactly what the situation herre with Mae is..." why don't you print it out and read it until you do understand it.
Isn't it a bit intellectually lazy to not make an effort to understand it and instead say, "well I dont' get it, so I'll jsut assume it is a private family matter?"
C'mon use your gray cells!!!
And I'm not saying this in a derogatory way, but more of a request to "get busy"