okay your position is well thought out, reasoned and accepted. That is what you would want for YOU. You understand it to be the same thing your husband would want.
How about Mae's case here? From what we know at face value. Living Will clearly shows when she would want to be stared and dehydrated to death. Do you think the Judge made a good decision putting the granddaughter in charge as Mae's Guardian when the granddaughter ordered her grandmother to be starved to death when grandma wasn't "dying." This is granddaughter (same as Terri Schindlers Husband in Name only) actively forcing death on an otherwise living person, who is not in the act of dying.
Good move by the Judge, or do you think the Sister and Brother and Nephew would have been better guardians. Re-read the post first what is wrong with Mae then comment on if the Judge selected the best in family as guardian.
I don't know... I had a hard time following exactly what the situation here with Mae is... and based on my lack of information about it, I wouldn't dare say. I am pretty slow to take internet information and run with it. My main 'agenda' really is that I don't think the public should be involved in these decisions. At some point we have to trust that those near us, and Godforbid, any judge asked to hear our case, will be fair and just.