Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul
The court did not refuse to make rulings based upon supposition, innuendo, and unfounded allegations. This is exactly what they did - they made a ruling that Terri did not want water because her husband, HIS brother, and HIS brothers wife said that is what she said. If that is not a ruling on suppositions I don't know what is. They also threw out other testimony that Terri said she did not agree with the feeding tube being removed from Kathleen Quinlin.
36 posted on 03/25/2005 8:26:46 AM PST by blueriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: blueriver

People here keep using this specious term "threw out evidence" - the court DID NOT "throw out" that evidence - it received it, considered it, and found it to be less credible than the countervailing evidence. Since you didn't hear the testimony in court, you have no way of determining the soundness of that decision, or lack thereof.


41 posted on 03/25/2005 8:31:01 AM PST by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson