I understand that the weapons, if they ever were there at all, were long gone by the time the first American soldier set foot in the area, although Kerry and the media are trying to imply U.S. forces let the stuff be stolen right from under their noses.
That's why I didn't understand the significance of BWB's post..#74. It seems to say the weapons WERE there when our soldiers arrived...meaning the libs will blame us for losing them. Right? I'm so confused.