So we are to conclude:
1. They either were either ahead in the battleground states previously and the debates have taken them back to merely competing. [This is somewhat unlikely.]
2. They were actually behind in the battleground states previously and lying about it and after the debates they are up to competing. [In this case they are liars about this topic so why believe their current statement.]
This seems like a no win e-mail that is merely an attempt to buckup supporter to stay with the homophobes?
My thoughts exactly. They are deperately trying to 'rally' their side.
> So we are to conclude:
> 1. They either were either ahead ...
> 2. They were actually behind ...
3. They are dangerously low on cash.
Especially if a measly $5Mil matters.