[AZLiberty]

It ends up in the same place. Someone will invoke "equal protection", and then you're back to the need for a Constitution change.

[Dutch Boy]

A gay marriage amendment is needed but from the gay side. If gays want the law to change they are the ones that need to do it. It should never have gotten to the point that the traditional side has to write legislation to keep things the same. On the other hand, I think the gay activists know that the general population of the country would reject gay marriage by a huge margin.