Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Prime Choice
One side of the moon always faces the Earth. In the event that command centers on Earth were destroyed in a surprise attack, the moon would function as a station of retaliatory strikes against the aggressor. Considering that the Earth makes one revolution every 24 hours, and that the lunar center would have a large advance notice, it could pick and choose its targets at leisure and launch an attack against which no other nation on Earth has a defense.

ROFLMAO.

Care to explain how any of the above wouldn't be accomplished even more easily and cheaply from Geosychronous orbit?

BTW, we're signatory to a treaty banning nukes in space.

37 posted on 12/03/2003 3:44:12 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: John H K
Who says we have to use nukes? :-)
41 posted on 12/03/2003 3:46:20 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: John H K
Care to explain how any of the above wouldn't be accomplished even more easily and cheaply from Geosychronous orbit?

Stationary placement on a naturally-moving platform. Requires no resources for orbital maintenance. Can't be taken out by "killer satellites."

BTW, we're signatory to a treaty banning nukes in space.

...and China? Don't recall their signing it.

Am I to presume that you think China would be going to the moon if it didn't hold some military significance to them? Guess again.

45 posted on 12/03/2003 3:51:04 PM PST by Prime Choice (Conservative: One who doesn't believe that turning the U.S. into a third-world nation is 'progress'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson