Replies

Oh, and it gets even better..

Another thread (can't find it now, but it does exist SOMEWHERE outside of FR) talks about the tactic behind a future "suitcase nuke" attack..

Apparently, we have satellite transponders - 3 or so of them that control the vast majority of military satellites that watch for remote Russian ICBM launches. (These transponders apparently have to be at ground level and not buried in mountain ranges due to the fact they need clear line-of-sight [like DirectTv?] to the satellites).

The (apparent) goal is to take these out, "blinding" the US to the "big" attack (eg: ICBMs) that will follow. Of course, the fact that the US will be in total anarchy due to a "surprise" suitcase nuke attack (which will not surprise me in the SLIGHTEST if it happens in the next year or two) will be nothing but an added bonus that will prevent us from thinking clearly/protecting ourselves. After all, most of the leaders could be dead at that point, and we'd be on "auxillary" leadership control. (President Cheney, anyone?)

Ya see..no satellites..no early warning system. We'd literally be sitting ducks.

I used to play a lot of chess. This sure feels like a huge, geopolitical chess game being played for world domination - and AQ is the pawn/proxy.