Posted on 10/18/2026 5:56:17 AM PDT by Twotone
Midterm elections are where people convince themselves the stakes are lower. There is no presidential race at the top of the ballot, turnout drops, and millions of Americans decide they can afford to sit one out. But history has a way of punishing that assumption, because enormous amounts of political power can turn on margins so small they barely seem real.
In 1916, America ALMOST elected Republican Charles Evans Hughes as President. Instead, his razor-thin defeat gave Woodrow Wilson a second term and, with it, one of the darkest four-year periods in U.S. history. Remarkably, it all came down to a squabble between Republicans in California.
Hughes, a former New York governor and Supreme Court Justice, was running against incumbent Woodrow Wilson. California was then considered a Republican stronghold, but the state GOP was divided between its conservative and progressive wings. Hughes represented the conservative faction, while California Gov. Hiram Johnson was a leading progressive.
Then came a bizarre misunderstanding. In August 1916, Hughes checked into the Virginia Hotel in Long Beach, where Johnson was already staying, though Hughes had no idea he was there. Johnson expected a courtesy call and, when none came, took it as a deliberate insult. Hughes tried to repair the damage after learning what happened, but Johnson refused to play nice, and progressive Republicans in California largely withheld their support.
The feud lingered through the campaign and ate away at Hughes’ advantage. By the end of Election Day, Hughes appeared to have won; the New York Times even went to press declaring him the next President. But California was still counting, and when the dust settled, Wilson carried the state by only 3,420 votes. Its 13 electoral votes were enough to hand him a second term.
A misunderstanding at a hotel helped fracture a state party, and 3,420 votes helped determine who occupied the White House during one of the most consequential periods in American history.
Wilson’s second term brought America into World War I and ushered in sweeping restrictions on speech and dissent. His administration prosecuted political opponents, subjected mail to federal scrutiny, and encouraged networks of informants to report their neighbors. The consequences of that election were enormous, even though the margin that helped decide it was tiny.
That is the lesson for the 2026 midterms.
Political power is often decided at the margins, and midterms magnify that reality. A handful of close House races can determine who controls the chamber. One or two Senate races can determine who runs the committees, controls the agenda, confirms judges and executive nominees, and decides which legislation ever reaches the floor.
You do not know beforehand which district will decide control of the House or which Senate race will tip the balance. You do not know whether the decisive margin will be 30,000 votes, 3,000 votes, or 300.
You only know after the votes are counted.
That is what makes sitting out a midterm such a gamble. Midterms may not feel as dramatic as presidential elections, but they determine who writes the laws, who controls spending, who conducts investigations, and whether an administration can advance its agenda or spends the next two years fighting Congress.
So when someone says their vote does not matter because “it’s only a midterm,” or that they are sitting it out because they “can’t stand the Republican nominee,” tell them about Charles Evans Hughes, Hiram Johnson, a petty squabble at a hotel in Long Beach, and the 3,420 votes that helped change the course of American history.
Sometimes the biggest consequences begin with the smallest margins.
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
AOC
Interesting story without which much of what you cover might never have happened.
A mormon and a former drunk. Combination is too scary for me.
So the early version RINOs threw the election to the Democrat. Things never change.
The democrats tortured us with Russian, Russia, Russia, and obstructed just about everything Trump tried to do to when COVID hit.
I don't care how bad the GOP options are, I'm not staying home for a repeat of that.
I won’t stay home. I’ll vote.
Beck forgot to say “this is the most important midterm of our lifetime.” But the article cries the same sentient.
Which, of course, is what they cry ALL THE TIME.
However, the historical record tells us that’s fake news. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_midterm_election#Historical_record_of_midterm.
The two most meaningful elections of our time were 1980, 1992, and 2016. They gave us pivots toward conservatism, Boomerism, and atomization, res.
As for the midterms…well…The President’s party almost always loses House seats, and the Senate is a bit of a toss up.
The only midterms that had impact were in 1994 and 2010. But all those did was tap on the brakes.
What’s gonna happen in 2026 is the Dems take over the House, and maybe the Senate. We will get 2 years of hearings, name-calling, bluster, and chest-thumping. Maybe an impeachment or two. Blah blah blah.
Trump will keep tweeting, saying we’re two weeks away from solving Iran. In about a year we will start seeing retrospective articles on his political career. That will be followed by Rubio and Vance jockeying for the nomination. The same will hold for whichever loser the Dems put forward.
In the meantime, taxes will go up, spending will increase, and Leviathan will trample us underfoot. As usual.
This isn’t nihilism. It’s reality. Acting otherwise is just foolish.
Conservative votes in California don’t mean squat.
We do it anyway.
I’ll vote because I always vote. It’s a matter of principle.
But no - my vote can’t possibly change anything nationally because there is no statewide Senate race in my PA district and the Democrat incumbent candidate for House of Representatives is a shoo in.
Madeleine Dean’s winning margins in U.S. House general elections for PA-04 were:
2018: 27.0 percentage points
2020: 19.0 points
2022: 22.6 points
2024: 18.1 points
But we’ll still vote of course.
I’m so sorry you have her. She is so unlikable to me. I can’t believe she wins by that much.
We’re going to vote even though the Dominion voting machine will likely flip our vote to the Democrat. 😣
I don’t know what’s gone wrong with my district - eastern Montgomery county is just way too close to Philadelphia’s urban sprawl, I guess.
We moved here in 1958 when I was six and it was all small rural towns separated by farms and wetlands. We had enough woods to get lost in. Train tracks and streams to explore.
Now, that’s mostly gone and these areas are called suburbs. The farms got developed into cluster housing - roads got widened and lined with strip malls. My town itself hasn’t changed much other than lots more traffic cutting through, but what’s missing is the farms and wilderness between the towns - all gone.
I think the urbanization of an area necessarily makes it turn Democrat as people in close quarters seem to want to mind other people’s business. Rural folks just want to be left alone, so they vote Republican if only to vote against the Democrat.
I should have moved out to Lancaster or Berks county, where it’s still rural.. even Bucks county isn’t far enough and we used to think of that as “farm country”.
So sad. However, that’s happening all over the country when I moved here 12 years ago, we had vast lands of cows, orange Groves, and all kinds of vegetative life. I’m in Leesburg Florida home of the villages. however I don’t live in the villages but they are chomping up everything and making homes that you literally could put your hand through the window and shake your neighbor’s hand. It’s quite ridiculous.
bkmk
The Never Trumper speaks...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.