Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DFG

Defense attorneys jury-shop all the time. I was once excluded from serving on a jury because the crooked progressive defense attorneys knew I was going to vote to convict their slimeball client. But prosecutors had better not shop for honest servants!

I hope the prosecutors are weeding out all the D.C.-area dumb Marxists and daft liberal housewives from serving on grand juries. They are going to vote their politics no matter what.


6 posted on 12/06/2025 11:27:26 AM PST by Combat_Liberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Combat_Liberalism

Voir dire (French for “to speak the truth”) is the process in a legal trial where judges and attorneys question potential jurors and witnesses to determine their suitability, uncover biases, and ensure they can be fair and impartial, often involving challenges for cause or peremptory challenges to exclude them from the jury or to qualify an expert witness.
The facts in the James case are cut & dried: she represented to the lender that the real property would be her primary residence. That was a lie and it is mortgage fraud.
If she isn’t tried, we’ll have to change the saw to, “ A grand jury will indict a ham sandwich, but not Letitia James. “


12 posted on 12/06/2025 11:37:15 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Combat_Liberalism

hope the prosecutors are weeding out all the D.C.-area dumb Marxists and daft liberal housewives from serving on grand juries.

DC voted 90% Kamala, 6% Trump. There is no weeding them out.


16 posted on 12/06/2025 11:42:24 AM PST by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Combat_Liberalism

The very first question that should be asked of jurors (when dealing with a bureaucratic or politician defendant is... “Are you now, or ever been, employed by a State or Federal government”

Bureaucrats should never be allowed to sit in judgement of other bureaucrats. Government protects itself.


40 posted on 12/06/2025 1:23:30 PM PST by VetoBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Combat_Liberalism

This is regarding a grand jury proceeding not a normal trial by jury....which makes it even more disturbing....


43 posted on 12/06/2025 2:29:18 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Combat_Liberalism

This is a grand jury to determine whether there’s an indictment. Defense attorneys having nothing to do with them.
The prosecutor is incompetent or corrupt. My bet is corrupt prosecutors working for deep state.
Since GJs are secret we can’t even find out the prosecutor who f’ed up.
About 95% of DOJ gave to the Dems. Advancement in DoJ or as attorney depends on fidelity to leftist ideology.
This is the exception to the ham sandwich rule.


44 posted on 12/06/2025 3:08:16 PM PST by grumpygresh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson