It still does. Many of the people affected by this order were were people who were pardoned or had sentences commuted. Each one of those is now subject to being re incarcerated or otherwise having his or her commutation/pardon voided due to this order. That gives each of them standing to challenge it, which they assuredly will. The challengers will probably find one or more communist judges who agree with them. That will set up a major Supreme Court case on the question of what the meaning of issuing a pardon is, a case that will include executive orders that have been voided and people who will claim their rights were violated by that voiding. The Supreme Court will have to go into the history of the Pardon clause and come up with a rule, one that I suspect will be much like the rule under the Statute of Frauds that requires any transaction affecting title to land to be memorialized and implemented by a written instrument signed by the person Who is claimed the one to be bound by that instrument.
I hope Adam Schiff sticks his pencil neck out and claims standing.
He so coyly acted like he didn’t know if he was going to accept it. Of course he will. It was all an act.
EC