Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They Couldn’t Kill Trump—So They Dug Up Epstein, Ignored 26 Clinton Flights, and Screamed About a Sealed File They Know He Can’t Release
Flopping Aces ^ | 07-24-25 | DrJohn

Posted on 07/24/2025 11:21:30 AM PDT by Starman417

democrats have no message for America. None. Donald Trump has them careening about trying to find something to stand for. Their Russiagate hoax has collapsed and the cretins of the intelligence community (Brennan, Clapper, Comey and assorted scum and villainy) are in jeopardy of going down with it.  So, democrats changed course- to defending illegal alien criminals over Americans. Americans aren't liking that either, so they've turned to a Hail Mary play- demanding that Trump release the Epstein files. Guilt by association.

It's a Machiavellian ploy. They know whatever remains can't be released without a court order. Former Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz confirmed that.

"I don't think you can fault Pam Bondi or the Justice Department," when it comes to releasing any redacted or sealed materials, Dershowitz told Van Susteren. "They don't have the authority to release this redacted material or the sealed material. I think — I can't know this for sure — that they've released everything that they are able to release."
And in fact, a court just refused to allow the release requested by Trump:
A Florida federal judge shot down the Trump administration’s bid Wednesday to release grand jury transcripts from an investigation that ended in notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein taking a much-criticized plea deal in 2008.

West Palm Beach US District Judge Robin Rosenberg wrote in a 12-page ruling that “the Court’s hands are tied” because the request by the government to release the transcripts was not tied to an ongoing trial.

The Justice Department had filed a petition Friday requesting transcripts from proceedings of federal grand juries that were convened in South Florida in 2005 and 2007 to investigate Epstein, who was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell on Aug. 10, 2019, at the age of 66 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges.

These transcripts would almost certainly exonerate Trump, who is not accused of any wrongdoing. Virginia Giuffre testified that she never saw Trump involved in any illicit activities.

yet democrats keep playing the same hand- screaming "release the files."

That Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files is absolutely old news, but he is hardly the only one mentioned. There are a number of high-profile people. Let's have a look at who else is mentioned in the Epstein "files" prior to Epstein's 2006 arrest:

There are people mentioned after Epstein's 2006 arrest too The Epstein flight logs include a lot of names in addition to Trump (who at least once brought then wife Marla Maples and daughter Tiffany):

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bothsides; clinton; defamation; deletezotthetrolls; democrats; denydeflectdistract; epstein; epsteindistraction; epsteinsmear; lolwhoisthey; trump; wrapupsmear; yellowjournalism

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 07/24/2025 11:21:30 AM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

FA forgot one...

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/12/20/mps-question-lord-mandelsons-role-ambassador-epstein-links/


2 posted on 07/24/2025 11:22:58 AM PDT by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

btt


3 posted on 07/24/2025 11:29:03 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY (The media is corrupt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

The Dems are desperate. They don’t believe in “maybe we’ll win next time.”

They make organized crime bosses look like Mr. Rogers.

May God protect Donald Trump, his family and his supporters.


4 posted on 07/24/2025 11:32:27 AM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

The Dems are desperate. They don’t believe in “maybe we’ll win next time.”

They make organized crime bosses look like Mr. Rogers.

May God protect Donald Trump, his family and his supporters.


5 posted on 07/24/2025 11:34:32 AM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Bookmark.


6 posted on 07/24/2025 11:34:56 AM PDT by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

There is no list. AI pilpul as follows:
In February, Bondi stated during a Fox News interview that the Jeffrey Epstein client list was “sitting on my desk right now to review”.
This statement generated significant attention and led to expectations of the release of a list detailing individuals associated with Epstein’s activities.
However, the Department of Justice subsequently released a memo in July stating that their review of the Epstein files found no evidence of a “client list”. The memo also concluded that there was no evidence that Epstein had blackmailed prominent individuals.
This contradicted Bondi’s earlier public statement and led to scrutiny and criticism, particularly from some of President Trump’s supporters.
In response to the memo and the ensuing criticism, Bondi later clarified her previous statement, asserting that when she said a list was on her desk, she was referring to the broader collection of files related to the Epstein investigation, not a specific “client list”.
Therefore, while there was initially a statement from Bondi suggesting the existence and impending review of an Epstein client list, the Department of Justice later stated that their review of the files found no evidence of such a list. Bondi then clarified her previous statement, indicating she was referring to the case files in general.

What she meant to say is, there never was a list. Or a laptop.
Keep being stupid, proles.
Ignorance Is Strength


7 posted on 07/24/2025 11:36:51 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Epstien story is smoke and mirrors.


8 posted on 07/24/2025 11:38:58 AM PDT by exnavy (See article IV section 4 of our constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

RE: they dug up Epstein....

Literally it would do no good as he was cremated and above ground in a crypt now.

A medical examiner not assigned to the case said Epstein’s supposed hanging of a man of his age would have had different bruises and thickness of them, which did not match the ones on photos of his body.
He was rushed to cremation so no one could do further questioning and examination. Or exhume him as a number of cases around the country have had for new scientific analysis not available at the time of the deaths.

https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/jeffrey-epsteins-body-reportedly-sealed-in-unmarked-crypt-alongside-his-family/news-story/3edf7f97c57c9f23d0a05e617d700059


9 posted on 07/24/2025 11:39:12 AM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

The suggestion of impropriety is all the left needs to churn the news cycles into presidential malfeasance.
This was their highly successful mechanism to get rid of politicians who they wanted to get rid of.
President Trump has ended that forever because his supporters know that the media has fed them lie after lie only to find out years later the actual truth


10 posted on 07/24/2025 11:45:29 AM PDT by daku
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Use the Treasury Dept’s Epstein file.

FINCEN


11 posted on 07/24/2025 11:46:33 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Biden’s DOJ and FBI had the Epstein files for Four years.

Comey and Strzok had them before that.

If you believe they don’t know every period and comma in those files, you’re an Idiot of the first order.


12 posted on 07/24/2025 11:58:26 AM PDT by OakOak (Misinformation Campaign on your TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daku

The Democrats only need to to convince a few million in toss-up or leaning Midterm races. They are regurgitating TDS attacks like they are new. Most American voters have an attention span of a fly.


13 posted on 07/24/2025 12:01:36 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave e them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OakOak

And your point is what exactly?? They are too dumb to cover up Russian Gate but are going to get away with Epstein Gate hoax?

Bondi can trot on over and release the OPR transcript. Alex Acosta is still alive and can dispute what it says if necessary. He likely has a copy.

Then she can inquire about a CIA name trace. As Mike Benz pointed out Rolling Stone can mention some random dude who makes a CIA allegation and it triggers a name trace.

Then Bondi can get Bessent on the phone and discuss the Treasury Epstein file and discuss the two SARS filed by Bank of America years after they should have been reported about 170 million dollars worth of transfers...and on and on and on...


14 posted on 07/24/2025 12:05:03 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: shanover

pretend you know nothing about this 1.46 minute clip. Who wins the optics in this clip??

hint..it’s not Higgins.

https://x.com/PatriotPulsePA/status/1948415549106434334


15 posted on 07/24/2025 12:06:41 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

And in the end none of it will matter. Its clear anything illegal or even salacious wouldve already been used against him in the last 4 years. This may be one of the bigger blunders the left has made in a while. They are running out of ammo and flailing bigly. They are trying so hard to make this a crisis for him and the GOP when its clearly not. Slowly the left is managing to galvanize the two sides of the GOP who are bickering about the files importance. Its hilarious and it make s me smile knowing no one beleives them about anything anymore. They have jumped the shark.


16 posted on 07/24/2025 12:11:43 PM PDT by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

LOL. I don’t think that’s what they meant.


17 posted on 07/24/2025 12:16:33 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Until Republicans start getting tough with the Dems this will go on.


18 posted on 07/24/2025 12:18:12 PM PDT by dljordan (The Rewards of Tolerance are Treachery and Betrayal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

There was just a vote in the Senate with Dems voting” no on concealment of Epstein files” ..they said this as they voted hammering the point to the public...and Republicans voting yes.

This hot potato is going to go back and forth with gamesmanship played

Higgins got outplayed by Dems. the video of that vote was ridiculous.

This could all stop if BlondiBondi cooperated but she isn’t.

this will rage on until someone actually investigates info that the public knows is available such as the Treasury Epstein files that do not take a Judge to view.


19 posted on 07/24/2025 12:24:06 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
"I don't think you can fault Pam Bondi or the Justice Department," when it comes to releasing any redacted or sealed materials, Dershowitz told Van Susteren

So why did the idiot Blondi announce that she had the files "on my desk"?

20 posted on 07/24/2025 12:24:17 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson