Dean, you jump around a bit in this article, while also not spelling out a few acronyms. The content is good, though.
Please consider unraveling NFA and SBR. Also, you don’t describe up front much about the concept of the amnesty and why that matters for hearing protection. Instead, you jump into declaring an amnesty and it sounds like it will let people do a lot more than something with hearing. You mean to say noise suppressors / “silencers” are the bugaboo you are referencing and that an amnesty would let everyone buy these and also claim ones they “illegally” already have. It would also let people buy automatics or place the mechanisms into their current guns, I assume. You don’t clearly talk to this, though.
Your articles are usually better structured, sir. Please consider a few tweaks to this.
Thanks for the constructive criticism.
I usually explain acronyms on the first usage.