Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is there a new leaker at the Supreme Court?
X ^

Posted on 06/21/2024 11:44:16 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe

Just days ago, the Biden regime announced a radical new executive order to legalize the immigrant spouses of citizens, even if those immigrants were in the U.S. to commit crimes or were here legally. It was very strange timing for such an oddly specific EO.

Now we know why: the Supreme Court ruled today in a 6-3 decision that the U.S. is not required to admit immigrant spouses of American citizens in a case involving an MS-13 member whose spouse was a U.S. citizen and who demanded legalization.

“From this Nation’s beginnings, the admission of noncitizens into this country was characterized as ‘of favor [and] not right,” the Court ruled.

Somebody at the White House was clearly tipped off about the unannounced Supreme Court decision, which explains why the White House rushed out such a shoddily written and argued new executive order to open the border even more: the Biden regime knew how the Supreme Court was going to rule, and it sought to pre-empt the court with its absurd EO.

So the question now is: who, exactly, is leaking information on rulings to the Biden White House?


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 202406; illegals; immigration; ms13; spouses
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Theoria

Don’t know the number, here’s a report from June 18.

https://www.npr.org/2024/06/18/nx-s1-5009193/some-undocumented-immigrants-married-to-u-s-citizens-may-be-guarded-from-deportation


21 posted on 06/21/2024 1:00:18 PM PDT by Cats1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

I’m not sure telling the president counts as a link. I wouldn’t be surprised if the president and congressional leaders are pretty regularly given info about soon to be announced rulings just as courtesy.


22 posted on 06/21/2024 1:00:32 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

It could be anybody. Could be the lowest clerk or typist or whatever. I don’t think one of the justices would be involved.


23 posted on 06/21/2024 1:05:03 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

Lol, I would guess at least 4 or 5 of the current judges!-)


24 posted on 06/21/2024 3:51:50 PM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson