One of the things with people in the news is they try to move fast. If this had a written list of bullet points, lots of people will skim them, and if they are catchy, you will get coverage.
The problem with this is, it is another, watch this video, and listen to this two hour interview on audiotape, with no indication of why it might be interesting.
People will assume, if this treaty said we will have to sacrifice five infants per year to Molloch, it would be in the headline, or at least in the blurb. As it stands, this will get classified in their mind as just another two hour audio interview which rehashes something they already read elsewhere, and they will skip it. Nobody has two hours for an audio interview, which might have nothing new, that is in the business.
The video was a prior posting. The new piece was the actual statement from the WHO, which had not been released yet. And the link provided access to that pdf in a downloadable format. Those who are following this probably understood that. I doubt that Roguski had read the whole thing at the time he posted in order to put out bullet points. But I’m sure he’ll be posting more in the future.