Thanks. I understood they would have required the tax stamp and wondered if any were.
The trouble now is the “in common use” caveat in the recent SCOTS decisions. The select fire rifles are not in common use only because they are banned. If surplus M-14 and M-16 rifles could be had, they would certainly be in common use.
Agree ... and that even applies to new build rifles for the citizen market. There is no technological or engineering for a select-fire rifle to cost more than a semi-auto only. They would be in common use if they weren’t banned or prohibitively taxed.