This thread is misleading. This particular Petition is obviously now dead-listed, won’t even get a second of discussion at their next January 6th conference meeting, and set to be put on the CERTIORARI DENIED list along with the rest of the dead-listed ones and most of the ones that actually do get discussed but have 0, 1, 2, or 3 justices who want further action (but not the 4+ needed to proceed).
Here is this petition’s docket and the fact that there has not been any call made for a Response is telling that it’s dead-listed. If at least 1 Justice (out of 9) has shown interest in having the Case discussed then the Clerk would’ve put out a Call for Response.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
Only a dishonest and/or ignorant fool would think otherwise.
Now, if something changes on this docket before January 6th, such as the Clerk putting out a Call for Response, then I will reconsider my opinion on this. It’s just that tens of thousands of cases have gone down this same path and in every situation I’ve ever seen with the path like this particular Petition its ended as CERTIORARI DENIED. I have never seen one like this where its beome CERTIORARI GRANTED. Just look at the docket history on all of the Petitions that get CERTIORARI GRANTED and see for yourself.
Your own links prove that as I've shown you!