George Washington and the Electoral College

Illinois Review ^ | February 4, AD 2022 | John F Di Leo

[nicollo]

An audit is not a count.

[Dave W]

LOL!! That's hysterical. You must not have followed the Maricopa County audit. It was a count. The actual physical ballots were counted twice by hand. An image was taken of each physical ballot and the images were hand counted. That is a total of 3 hand recounts. The 3 hand counts matched the machine count from election night. The AZ Senate was also hand counted 3 times and it matched.

Fulton County GA did a hand recount and that matched the machine count, too. A county in Michigan and a town in New Hampshire did a hand recount and it matched.

So now we know the machines are fine. The focus should be on eliminating illegal ballots. That is a much harder task then just spouting machines are wrong, the machines are wrong, the machines are wrong.

[nicollo]

If the “audit” merely recounted ballots without assessing their validity, it was no audit.

Sorry to repeat myself.

[jfd1776]

Count the ballots.

Count them again.

Count them again.

That’s all they ever do.

They don’t care where the ballots came from, how many are illegitimate, how many are photocopied, how many were cast by people using the registrations of dead people, moved-away people, and fictional people...

Fraud rarely occurs in the count. It can, but it’s rare.

Vote Fraud occurs in the casting of the ballots.

And that’s what they not only never check, but they fight to the death to stop us from preventing.

[Dave W]

You still have not demonstrated any understanding about the Maricopa County audit. The audit received a huge amount of attention, so I am not certain as to how you are confused.

The 3 different hand recounts were only one aspect. Are you aware they analyzed each ballot under special lights to show ballots that may not be legitimate?

Ultimately, they released multiple pages of audit results that showed many issues with the election. One of the main issues identified was about 17,000 ballots that were clearly illegally counted. There were many pages that explained and showed irregularities. Look it up and read it to educate yourself.

There is only one thing they did not complete that was in the original audit plan. The DOJ did not allow them to go door to door asking the person at home if they actually voted. The DOJ threatened to bring lawsuits against them, so they dropped that part of the audit, but other organizations have done so. That has also been documented in detail. Look it up. They have come across single family homes in which scores of people voted from that address or the homeowner has stated on the record they did not vote, but someone voted using their name. It's all documented - all of it.

The results have been given to the state legislature and there is a movement to decertify AZ electors. Who knows if that will happen and even if it does, it won't have any effect on how the election turned out since there is no provision in the Constitution for a do over.

I'm surprised you are not aware as to how well the audit turned out and the significant amount of irregularities that were discovered - I'm actually a bit stunned you don't know this.

The audit got a huge amount of attention here and on other conservative websites. It also received a fair amount of attention from the MSM, which was mainly focused on the outcome of the 3 hand counts of ballots. Once they reported the hand counts matched the machines, the MSM skipped over everything else.

The audit was a complete success and was done painstakingly with much thought. This is the first time a county has had an actual forensic audit and it took 4 months to complete. It's very impressive what they did.

The other thing the audit accomplished is the state legislature is passing new electoral integrity laws so it doesn't happen again. It hasn't been finalized yet, but should be a big improvement.