Posted on 01/10/2021 9:10:40 AM PST by USA Conservative
John Sullivan, a noted leftist leader from Utah, stormed the US Capitol with fellow activists on Wednesday.
The mainstream media and the fact-checkers tried to protect him and claimed that he was there only to film the whole situation.
Even far-left PolitiFact reviewed Sullivan’s video of the mob into the Capitol and Babbitt’s shooting. They say that it doesn’t show Sullivan clearly engaged in the violence or leading the run-up to the Capitol, although it does show him animated as he spoke with police and rioters from the frontlines.
At points in the video, Sullivan can be heard telling others he was only filming and discouraging violence. At other points, he appeared to encourage what was happening. As rioters scaled a wall outside, for example, he cheered them on. “We did this s—, together,” he said after the barricades came down. “This is f—— history. We’re all a part of this f—— history.”
But Desert News who made an interview with Sullivan claim that some of the 40-minute video he posted to his social media sites contradicts his assertion that he and another woman were “only filming” the actions and not participating as he can be heard in the video encouraging people to join them as they push their way through police barricades.
Just after people broke into the building, Sullivan — wearing a gas mask and wielding an iPhone on a stabilizing stick — and a woman who said Wednesday that she was making a documentary on Sullivan, are on the first porch area outside the entrance looking back over the throngs of people around the Capitol. They can be heard encouraging people to climb the wall, saying, “Come on. Let’s go!”
On Friday, Sullivan insisted that he didn’t encourage violence or vandalism.
When asked about some of the things he said during the 40-minute video, he said, “When you’re in a massive crowd like that, you have to blend in.”
The riot was not an impromptu act, Sullivan said.
Just after people broke into the building, Sullivan — wearing a gas mask and wielding an iPhone on a stabilizing stick — and a woman who said Wednesday that she was making a documentary on Sullivan, are on the first porch area outside the entrance looking back over the throngs of people around the Capitol. They can be heard encouraging people to climb the wall, saying, “Come on. Let’s go!”
On Friday, Sullivan insisted that he didn’t encourage violence or vandalism.
When asked about some of the things he said during the 40-minute video, he said, “When you’re in a massive crowd like that, you have to blend in.”
The riot was not an impromptu act, Sullivan said.
The controversy surrounding him doesn’t stop here.
Here is another of John Sullivan’s website where he hosts a podcast and a blog.
In one episode he talks about the Secret Service calling him.
In this video, John Sullivan talks about being called by the Secret Service and plays a recording of it for his speech at a BLM rally threatening to “rip the president out of the White House” Video below: Link
In August John Sullivan threatened to “rip President Trump from the White House” during violence in Washington DC. Sullivan was flown to DC for the protests.
At the time John Sullivan was described as a Black Lives Matter leader from Utah.
This is one of John Sullivan’s Websites:
His January 2nd newsletter published the location of where Trump supporters were staying and warned that Black Lives Matter buses were being targeted.
Image below:
People online claimed that he is Federal Agent Provocateur and that’s why he was released from prison:
Even locals that John Sullivan has protested with have raised suspicion that he is a federal agent provocateur.
Images below:
On Friday investigative journalist Millie Weaver ran into John Sullivan in Washington DC.
She overheard him say he was not being charged.
Video below:
John Sullivan who was next to Ashli Babbitt (pictured below) when she was shot by Capitol Hill Police organized this Antifa/Black Live Matters, according to the police affidavit.
Images:
In the video, shots are fired as the car makes its way through a crowd.
Video below:
Police Affidavit: “As a protest organizer, John Sullivan is heard talking about seeing the shooting, looking at the gun, and seeing smoke coming from it. John did not condemn the attempted murder nor attempt to stop it nor aide in its investigation by police.”
Image below:
>>Even far-left PolitiFact reviewed Sullivan’s video of the mob into the Capitol and Babbitt’s shooting. They say that it doesn’t show Sullivan clearly engaged in the violence or leading the run-up to the Capitol, although it does show him animated as he spoke with police and rioters from the frontlines.
He’s tresspassing.
And Time used such photos from an intruder who was embedded in the tresspass.
Recall the outrage when the government wanted to tap the phone calls of people in the US communicating overseas with known terrorists.
Time Magazine had reporters who were engaged is such treason. “free press” they call it.
What you said, plus the video of the police escorting the Antifa shuttle buses through the crowd to the Capitol and then the police disperse sure look like the authorities were directly involved in the planned violence.
John Sullivan - “far-right agent provocateur”?
How do we get from Point A to Point B in this line of logic?
He was just there “recording for posterity”, yeah, right.
VAST amount of preparation and execution went into this operation. And not all of it was from outside, there was considerable cooperation of embedded agents within the US Capitol Police Service itself. Else why the “looking away” when the stir was going on at the side entrance, and the apparent ease by which the front ranks of the trespassers were let in through the door?
Bank heists proceed with less cooperation from the interior of the bank than the invaders were provided by the “authorities” (some of which may have also been under a “false flag”). BLM has had quite a reach, and they are exceptionally well funded.
We have a pretty good idea who were some of the major underwriters of this invasion and occupation. And it wasn’t the Christian Jericho March, either.
Okay. Nail him! Paint him as an agent provocateur! Have the left turn on him and destroy him! They made the rules. Now let them live by them. (e.g. Alinsky)
sort out his role to ‘judge’ Sullivan, Utah sex trafficking
and the RAT politician(s) from Utah, too.
Why the secrecy regarding the identity of the sharpshooter who killed Ashli Babbit by shooting her in the carotid artery? Was the sharpshooter from the Capital police, the FBI or Nancy Pelosi’s invited guest?
BLM supporter John Sullivan was inside the Capital filming the execution.
He and his movement are supported by Democrats, big tech, big media, the NBA, the NFL, major corporations, etc. Kamala Harris donated money and urged others to donate bail money for Antifa and BLM.
The corporate media is silent.
the sharp shooter? He was a cop with a handgun.
Yeah the Salt Lake FOX TV affiliate had a glowing segment on him this morning.
I noticed you failed to cite who, exactly, this 'cop' works for. Were you to actually investigate, you might stumble upon the story of a CIA asset working with USCP, or not.
And where was Sullivan when Pelosi’s laptop disappeared?
And filmed it quite expertly. I think the guy is an FBI subcontractor. He knew to photograph the gun. For several seconds he had his camera focused through the door's window onto the gun. When the assailant stepped out and fired, the videographer/Utah BLM rabble rouser/FBI plant (IMHO) followed that action and immediately panned to the victim, catching her falling backward to the floor.
His seemingly expert camera work, especially knowing immediately to follow the bullet's path rather than the shooter's next move, makes me think he knew quite well what was going to happen. He seemed to know there was no reason to keep his camera on the shooter; that there would be only one (expert) shot into the crowded hallway.
I seen the video... a jerky arm on the left inside the doors they were pounding on. then the arm raised a bit more and pulled the trigger.
And since were so righteous with wording, a “Sharp Shooter” is mostly referred to in the Sniper Rifle” category...
From what I understand, he was released without charges.
Why would he not in the least be charged with criminal trespass? Isn’t that a fair charge?
He's BLM.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.