Removing the Gun Control Agenda from EVERY Major American Political Party

Ammoland ^ | November 12, 2020 | Rob Pincus

[Rurudyne]

First you have to remove Marxism from the Left and the Democrats.

[Dead Corpse]

The thing is... The gun is just ONE tool... the Right being protected is really the Right to Self Defense and any tool that would make self defense easier should be considered protected.

But, what good are these tools if we aren’t allowed to USE them? Especially against tyranny...

[Celerity]

He voted for Biden.

Thank you for clearing that up, traitor.

You CAN NOT be both.

[Dead Corpse]

Make it legal to shoot a commie and we can get this cleared up before Thanksgiving...

[OKSooner]

Anyone who voted for Biden is a sucker.

Any gun owner, that is to say that anyone who owns even one gun and voted for Biden is a sucker and a chump.

BTW, how many Christians voted for Biden? Hint: There is a correct answer.

[Impala64ssa]

There's pics and vids all over social media showing BLM/ANTEEFA types openly carrying those nasty assault rifles. The Karens from Moms Demand Action and the little shyts from March for our Lives turn a blind eye to thatHell, they support them. This blatant hypocrisy is nothing new.
I grew up near where the Brinks murders took place at the old Nanuet Mall in 1981, by remnants of the weather underground an early incarnation of anteefa. My mom was planning on shopping there that day so yeah it's a little personal with me. To this day every Clarkstown, NY PO, every NYPD detective and FBI agent involved in that case have very good reason to believe Bill Ayers and Bernie Dhorn had some involvement.
Besides the atrocity of it all this crime was committed with ILLEGALLY OBTAINED FIREARMS by convicted felons who had no business laying a finger on a gun to begin with. Yet not one peep of outrage from the gun grabbers of the day, not from Handgun Control Inc, the Brady campaign or any hack politicians or a-hole celebs advocating for gun control. These were the same ones who were still raising holy hell over the murder of John Lennon a year earlier yet they were conspicuous by their silence over this. I learned early on how the left thinks they're slick when it comes to picking and choosing their battles.

[rktman]

Odd(?) ya never hear from the moms or margabby about miscreants shooting cops.

[Fiddlstix]

[Rurudyne]

Earlier today I proposed a terminology to describe folks like AntiFa or those who claim to be something but flatly hang out with folks opposed to that something (as when self-proclaimed “libertarians” are found in the company of AntiFa and Marxists ... which I maintain disproves their claim to be libertarians at all).

I mention the libertarian thing because some folks didn’t read far enough (and it wasn’t far at all) to realize I was not talking about actual libertarians.

I don’t really blame them though, because I’m the writer and they were the readers. Style footed “issues” are a writer’s problem.

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3906084/posts

[Gay State Conservative]

Will SCOTUS ever put an end to this decades along Maoist charade and rule that “shall not be infringed’ means exactly that?

[TigersEye]

... the Right being protected is really the Right to Self Defense and any tool that would make self defense easier should be considered protected.

The Founders understood that and wrote the 2nd Amendment to say "the right to bear arms" not guns.

[Dead Corpse]

Exactly my point... From “Rods from God” to John Wick’s Pencil...
All protected as an INDIVIDUAL Right...

[TigersEye]

I know that was your point.

[Rurudyne]

BTW, there’s a fellow going by Conservatoons on Deviant Art who has some funny stuff.

Considering the Furry Hell (cute pictures were one thing but as folks became more and more jaded through the years what is now considered okay is ... nope, just nope) much of the rest of the site seems to have devolved into his stuff by contrast is greatly appreciated by me.

https://www.deviantart.com/conservatoons/art/Peaceful-Protester-cartoon-860957082

[DoodleBob]

Candidly, there is only ONE Amendment in the Bill of Rights that has NOT been watered down. They've run all the others through the wash and rinse cycle, some of them more than several times. (Bonus points if you guess correctly.)

There are some people - statists, Deep Staters, traitors, etc. - who want this gradual erosion to happen. They tend to get their way in part, because men of good character yield a little here and there because they don't like a particular right. A great example is Kyllo v. United States. Scalia got blasted by War on Drugs conservatives over this opinion, but (IMHO) he was right. You don't shred the 4th Amendment to stop pot. Rehnquist sided with Stevens in that dissent...and then Stevens wrote Kelp< (which gets my vote for worst opinion since Roe) and Rehnquist wasn't there. Well, dude...you're either for a limitation on state power or you're not...this isn't a buffet.

Liberty isn't easy to take...stupid people do stupid things. But the way to stop that is to Amend the Constitution, not water it down. I pray Trump made some right judicial moves to bring things back in the direction you (and I) want.

[DoodleBob]

Also, what was the Massachusetts firearms case you often mention? We may finally have a court that can take up that case.

[Gay State Conservative]

Caetano v Massachusetts

Caetano v Massachusetts. In 2016 SCOTUS struck down a decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (the highest court in the state) which affirmed the conviction of Caetano for possession of a stun gun.They did so 9-0.

In their decision SCOTUS referred to the state court's justification for the conviction as "frivolous". Which is very apt...for the entire Commonwealth of Massachusetts is pretty much frivolous.

[Gay State Conservative]

Ooops...

Caetano v Massachusetts