p
So where is AG Barr?
... so alarming as to deem the complaint a matter of "urgent concern."
"Urgent concern" is a term or art in the ICIG statute. It has little to do with being alarming.
In this paragraph, the term "urgent concern" means any of the following:(i) A serious or flagrant problem, abuse, violation of law or Executive order, or deficiency relating to the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity within the responsibility and authority of the Director of National Intelligence involving classified information, but does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters.
(ii) A false statement to Congress, or a willful withholding from Congress, on an issue of material fact relating to the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity.
(iii) An action, including a personnel action described in section 2302(a)(2)(A) of title 5, constituting reprisal or threat of reprisal prohibited under subsection (g)(3)(B) of this section in response to an employee's reporting an urgent concern in accordance with this paragraph.
Atkinson and others somehow came to the obviously false conclusion that POTUS conduct of foreign afairs is within the responsibility and authority of the Director of National Intelligence.
Heard he’s being investigated as I type for changing to whistle blower rules to accomodate the non-whistle blower whistle blower. But with Barr in charge he shouldn’t worry:-)
PM me if you like on what happened to your Rosenstein thread.