“after Podesta threatened to kill the person that leaked the Clinton Emails”
Ugh, that old story again. That email Podesta sent was years before the leak of the Clinton emails, and it was specifically referring to job applicants who were leaking info on the DNC, and what Podesta wanted to do to them to stop those leaks. There was nothing about “killing” anyone in the entire email chain.
“after Podesta threatened to kill the person that leaked the Clinton Emails”
Ugh, that old story again. That email Podesta sent was years before the leak of the Clinton emails, and it was specifically referring to job applicants who were leaking info on the DNC, and what Podesta wanted to do to them to stop those leaks. There was nothing about “killing” anyone in the entire email chain.
18 months is not “years” (Email was dated 2/22/2015) Your contention is accurate, but the real point is what Podesta conveyed with regard to “making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it”.
I’m sure Podesta wasn’t referring to banning them from Starbucks.
1. Podesta made an Email stating how he will make examples of coworkers that leak information.
2. Crowdsrike received large payments by the DNC a couple days before Seth Rich was killed and the day after Seth Rich was killed by MS13 they recieved a larger payment.
3. After it was learned of the suspected killers. Politicians stopped the investigation by the FBI and private into Seth Rich.
Now we know Crowdstrike and their servers are in Ukraine