If you go back to population numbers of 1770, there are four states that chiefly matter: Virginia (450k), Penn & Mass (both 240k each), and Maryland (200k). Four states were 60,000 or less in residents (Georgia, Rhode Island, Del and New Hampshire). The fear for more than half of the states was that Virginia, Mass, and Penn would dominate voting, and enact laws that were more beneficial to them. This is why you have both a Senate and a House, and why the Electoral College exists like it is.
How we’ve changed in 200-plus years....massive urbanized areas now threaten the voting pattern. If you threw out the Electoral College....states like Montana, Wyoming, Alaska, and Utah wouldn’t matter. The same logic or wisdom in dismantling the Electoral College would then exist for dismissing the Senate.
I’ll point out one other factor, which the news media hasn’t discussed in twenty years. Go look at county by county voting since the mid-1990s. The Democrats are unable to show any strength in rural counties. The numbers were dwindling at the 2nd Clinton election, and have gone down in every single election since then. The truth is....the strength of the Democratic vote, is absolutely dependent now upon suburban regions.
We have a Constitution whose whole purpose on the federal level was to deny the mob control of the government and at the same time to deny tyrants control of the government. This is indeed a very narrow path to tread with traps and snares on either side but the goal of a representative government, safe both from the Jacobins and from Caesar, was one aspect among many reflecting the genius of the Framers. To tread the narrow path between the rule of the mob and the tyranny of Caesar, the framers were never deceived by Bernie Sanders' notion that the vote was more precious than the ultimate goal of a good representative government.
Hence, the framers had no qualms about limiting the franchise to whites, to men, the property owners and to citizens. They were quite at ease to deny the vote to slaves, females, non-freeholders.
The idea that the object of our great experiment is democracy alone is wrongheaded. The object of our constitutional Republic is good government in which the tendency toward tyranny is checked by democracy (in the House of Representatives) and the tendency toward mob rule is checked by the Senate, the college of electors, title III courts, and division of powers, not only on the federal level but between the federal level and the states.
There can be no more clear definition of "the mob" than the occupants of prison. Why would we risk our Republic, our checks and balances, our carefully but precariously balanced government to criminals? Why would we risk our system under the rule of law to convicted lawbreakers? The reason, of course, is that our modern-day neo-communists are essentially Jacobins who fervently want to pitch this country into the hands of the mob. History tells us that the man on horseback succeeds the mob. The Jacobins were followed by Napoleon and, equally, this experiment in mobocracy will lead inevitably to terror first and then to tyranny. Leftists are by nature God players, who reflexively exempt themselves from the ravages of their own policies. In this case they assume that they will emerge in the saddle to tread the narrow path between the rule of the mob and the tyranny of Caesar.
The framers had no qualms about limiting the franchise to whites, to men, the property owners and to citizens. They were at ease with themselves enough to deny the vote to slaves, females, non-freeholders..
The idea that the object of our great experiment is democracy alone is wrongheaded. The object of our constitutional Republic is good government in which the tendency toward tyranny is checked by democracy (in the House of Representatives) and the tendency toward mob rule is checked by the Senate, the college of electors, title III courts, and division of powers, not only on the federal level but between the federal level and the states.

Though the framers might not have foreseen this, the Electoral College is the firewall which saves us from at least one the ill effects of massive illegal migration into certain states (Kalifornia in particular).
And that is the real reason democRats are so interested in eliminating it.
H.R. 1: LEFT’S EFFORT TO ABOLISH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE UP FOR VOTE. CALL 202 224 3121!
A very wise Thomas Jefferson warned that the large cities would cause us major trouble! If he ONLY KNEW! This is why we have the ELECTORAL COLLEGE. This 6 minute video explains. https://www.brighteon.com/5841966834001
OUTSANDING!
“We cannot thank them enough!”
BUMP!
Yes, it gets in the way of “progressives”, so it must be abolished prontissimo.