No one cares what you think, Bill, because your thoughts simply aren’t relevant.
Yeah, change the law for the outcomes we desire!
Show me the man and I’ll find the crime!
Way to channel the KBG, you buttmunch.
What a moron. Speaking of morons, when will his anorexic girlfriend Ann Coulter come out with a screeching article all hateful of Trump and his victory over this collusion nonsense?
Seeking collusion statute. Any help would be appreciated.
So that means that ballfield fences were measured and installed wrong in various MLB ballparks and that teams like the Cubs and others should have won more World Series than they actually did. Seems to be this idiot’s logic in a nutshell.
When will Maher say even one thing pdjt did wrong? When? So far, Maher is making tons of $$$$ money from all his innuendo and slander. What he doesn’t have - and never did- is a single fact or piece of evidence. Nor even a coherent charge. Wtf is “collusion” supposed to mean anyway? Colluding with the him? For what objective? What law was allegedly broken? By whom? How? Where? When? I “collude” with my spouse deciding who picks up the children.
My boot, your ass.
all of this and he has not seen the report which means he can not know any of the facts so it is easy to see he is just another liberal bald faced liar.
“If the law supposes that,” said Mr. Bumble, squeezing his hat emphatically in both hands, “the law is an ass - an idiot”.
Well, Maher, wait till you see what can be used to jail the previous president for what he did.
You are going to be pleased to learn that when you have proof and real evidence, you can accuse without worrying about whether it is enough or not.
We have the “stuff” on your boy.
I hope you have the courage to face it.
There is no law against collusion.
Maher is a whiny, annoying moron who thinks he is profound.
Maher, and even Preet Bharara need to explain to the public the specific acts by which specific persons should have, in their opinion, amounted to “collusion” and only do not meet that standard due to a defect, and which defect, in the existing laws.
They won’t, because television journalism long ago told the facts to leave the studios, because hyper politics joined to innuendo is good enough to convict people in the public arena, and that gets ratings which means ad revenue.
Herodotus, Socrates, Moses, Justice Brandeis, move over. There's a new legal genius in town.
This is the NEW MEME that there WAS collusion BUT it didn’t come to the point of being able to indict!!! I am telling you this WILL NEVER STOP!! When they get the full report they will be SCREAMING that the redacted parts PROVE the collusion but they have been redacted!!!
Former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said, “The thing that Bob Mueller found, is that, based on the criminal statutes, he could not prove, beyond a reasonable doubt
In the real world, not the fantasy land that is DC/NYC/West Coast/Chicago/et al, not the ultra Partisan Witch Hunt to undo an election, it’s called being.....INNOCENT. If the prosecution does not have the evidence to prosecute you, then you are INNOCENT. If they take you to court and you win, then you are INNOCENT.
To think that Bharara is/was considered some type of Super Lawyer when he was at DOJ and he says something as biased and prejudiced as this. Amazing.
The DOJ routinely touts its conviction rate as being over 90% or something like that. What most folks don’t know is, they will cherry pick their cases so they know going into it, they’re going to win. Then, they use the full weight of the federal government to get you to plead, as they did in some of the cases associated with the farce.
When they charge folks with Perjury or Lying to an Investigator, many times it’s one word against another with no proof. You say you had lunch on Tuesday, their witness says it was on Wednesday. You’re lying and that’s what they run with, unless you can prove otherwise.
...hey Maher, ya write a check for the Covington kid yet?...azzhole