Posted on 03/23/2019 4:36:27 AM PDT by EyesOfTX
“So all we will see out of these despicable hacks – the ones who don’t break down in tears on live TV, anyway – will be a change in talking points to make it seem like they had predicted this outcome from Mueller’s operation all along, and that the “real action” is over in congress and the Southern District of New York U.S. Attorney’s office.”
Yep. That’s exactly what Harris Faulkner was doing on last night’s Fox News broadcast.
PDJT will turn the tables on these Leftist crooks — the list is long — all of whom deserve to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
“Mr. President, what is best in life?”
“To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women!”
“That is good.”
Hey those leftists are literally deranged...they will never ever stop....they will just keep diving into the rat hole....what a pathetic group of sickos...who would ever want them at the helm....
The greatest lie in US history.
Cynicism is actually a form of naiveté. In the sense that cynicism towards one thing implies naiveté towards its opposite.
Journalism is negative, and journalists know it - “If it bleeds, it leads” is Journalism 101. And yet journalists claim to be objective.
But that means that they are claiming that systematic negativity is objectivity. Who but a cynic could claim that?
Democrats simply go along and get along with journalists.
Mike Huckabee just said on Fox that the President should sue some of the intel bosses civilly.
22 Mar: Politico: Trump: I hope Barr will ‘do what’s fair’ with regards to investigating Hillary Clinton
By Caitlin Oprysko
President Donald Trump said Friday he hopes Attorney General William Barr will “do what’s fair” with regards to opening investigations to perceived crimes by his 2016 opponent Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, former intelligence chief James Clapper and former CIA Director John Brennan...
He accused Comey, Clapper and Brennan of telling “absolute lies” to Congress, ***declining to provide proof of his claim or elaborating further on their alleged lies...
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/22/trump-barr-clinton-investigation-1232147
someone should wipe the smug look off Brennan’s face:
19 Aug 2018: RealClearPolitics: John Brennan: “I Stand Very Much By” Accusing President Trump Of Treason; “He’s Bringing This Country Down”
By Tim Hains
VIDEO: 1min24sec
Sunday on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press,’ former CIA Director John Brennan said he believed President Trump’s decision to revoke his security clearance is “treasonous.” This is not the first time Brennan has accused President Trump of “treason,” and people are starting to get concerned.
When asked by Chuck Todd whether he regrets any comments he made about President Trump, Brennan said no, “I called his behavior treasonous which is to betray one’s trust and to aiding and abet the enemy and I stand very much by that claim.”
“You are the former CIA director,” host Chuck Todd said, sounding concerned. “Accusing the sitting president of the United States. You are not private citizens. A lot of people hear the former director of the CIA
Brennan continued: “I think these are abnormal times and I think a lot of people have spoken out against what Mr. Trump has done. And maybe it’s my warning, training as an intelligence professional. I have seen the lights blinking red in terms of what Mr. Trump has done and is doing and is bringing this country down on the global stage and fueling and feeding divisiveness in our country.”
He added, “He continually lies to the American people. The type of things he is doing, I need to speak out. I don’t believe I’m being political at all. I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat.”
FULL VIDEO/TRANSCRIPT
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/08/19/brennan_on_sunday_i_stand_by_accusing_president_trump_of_treason.html
Nancy will not be able to manage all of her idiots.
They will imagine "witches" everywhere.
"Well Trump might have been thinking about _________"
The Dems will hound and harass Trump for the rest of this term & the next if he’s re-elected. The hate for Trump is visceral with them & a terminal condition - they’ll never recover from TDS.
What has changed? The guillotine of the Mueller Investigation is no longer over Trump’s neck i.e. he was virtually handcuffed with the inability to declassify info, etc. while the investigation was going on .... if he did, the threat was that it would be “obstruction”. That threat has been lifted so I expect to see Trump doing some strategic & surgical strikes (i.e. declassification/info releases) when the “time is right”, according to his good instincts. The man WILL exact revenge on his enemies & it likely will be a dish served lukewarm, if not cold. One thing that has really surprised me about Trump - I am amazed at how “patient” he is and how good he is at feeding out rope and waiting until folks have enough to hang themselves. Trump’s Revenge won’t be tit for tat, either - he’ll take people down. Just my 2 cents.
Good idea.
And our president has just the right lawyer to do the job.
Can Trump sue the media while he is President. He has been smeared and harassed endlessly.
Although it’s difficult for a public figure to sue for character defamation in this country, agree Trump should try. Malicious intent and knowing at the time the information was false are present in spades as regards the president.
I understand public figures have difficulty claiming libel but 675 day’s worth of lies (or more) seems to break through any presupposed limit.
If (when) Trump releases the full reports and the full FISA Court requests, the national-social-communist party and their national press corpse WILL immediately claim "Trump committed treason by releasing FBI-CIA-NSA-foreign intelligence sources to the world to coverup his treasonous foreign family activity and his own nepotism and emolumonuments of molehills!"
Number of indictments against Americans – 8
***************
That’s a whopping $3.75 million for each person! This would be a hilarious farce if it wasn’t so serious.
The theory that the journalists work for the Democrats makes sense - but no more sense than that the Democrats work for Big Journalism.I see it as being that journalism is inherently cynical about society (when it claims to be objective knowing full well that “No news is good news” - because good news “isn’t news.”). Democrats see the way the (propaganda) wind (of journalism) blows, and see a business opportunity in going along and getting along with journalism.
Six of one, half a dozen of the other, perhaps - but it highlights that successfully (and rightfully) suing journalists for libel would eviscerate the Democrats, who have no other principles apart from following journalism.
Journalists are ideologically homogeneous and able to claim objectivity because, under the aegis of the wire services, they systematically go along and get along with each other.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.