Here you go, so why isn’t the SCOTUS acting?
Co-sponsor Stanley Chang (D-BEIJING) contends that “the whole notion that the 2nd Amendment was ever intended to allow individuals to own firearms is erroneous. The Amendment specifies that the right belongs to members of the militia. ALLOWING INDIVIDUALS TO OWN GUNS DILUTES GOVERNMENT CONTROL. Owning firearms gives individuals objecting to this control the means to cause disruption and disobedience. THE FUTURE BELONGS TO COLLECTIVISM. THE ARMED AGENTS OF THE LAW MUST BE FREE OF FEAR that opponents have viable means to resist the demands made upon them to cooperate with laws and rules promulgated by duly elected authorities.”
In earlier times the whole thing would obviously be satire but not anymore.