Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What if I told you that we have at least 10,000 years of power available to us (Nuclear Waste)
Twitter Mark Schneider ^ | 03/04/19 | Mark Schneider

Posted on 03/04/2019 1:26:10 PM PST by yesthatjallen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Cicero

Carter stopped The breeder reactor program and the Thorium program as well. The chicoms and indians are using all of our public information successful program information to fast track their own efforts.


41 posted on 03/04/2019 3:25:57 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just hava few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

We don’t even need to reprocess the fuel. The “waste” can still heat water, which can be used to heat buildings. Downtown Minneapolis for example, can be heated from waste.


42 posted on 03/04/2019 3:41:37 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

“Yes but the fuel rods are heavily used thus they have a great deal of Pu240 which is impossible to chemically separate from the Pu239 and also makes the plutonium unsuitable for bombs.”

Unsuitable but not impossible. We did it back in WWII.


43 posted on 03/04/2019 3:46:43 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

See Presidents Ford and Carter and their non-proliferation rules that included the prohibition against using spent fuel in breeder reactors.

http://www.123seminarsonly.com/Seminar-Reports/034/22542-Nuclear-Fuel-Reprocessing.pdf


44 posted on 03/04/2019 4:12:37 PM PST by Don W (When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Molten salt thorium reactors! Go baby go!


45 posted on 03/04/2019 5:19:40 PM PST by no-s (when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Well technically any source of neutrons can breed plutonium. The thorium cycle breeds U233 from thorium. Mix in some natural uranium and it could also breed plutonium, which could be recovered chemically. Also U233 could make a warhead, a very easily detectable one, but it could work as well. Never say never....


46 posted on 03/04/2019 5:27:44 PM PST by no-s (when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: no-s

U233 is actually a very poor bomb material, if at all.


47 posted on 03/04/2019 6:33:24 PM PST by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
U233 is actually a very poor bomb material, if at all.

Seeing as how it's actually been used in working fission devices with yields exceeding 20 KT, "if at all" is mooted. The thing that makes U-233 a substandard weapon material is the neutron absorption, it's not as reactive as U-235, so the critical mass must be higher and thusly the confinement is not as effective. It's a bad idea to work with it because it's way more radioactive than U-235 or Pu-239 and is not glovebox safe. The theory is the U-232 contamination from the thorium cycle would render bomb-making fatally hazardous and easily detectable. The problem with that theory is the world has already shown us plenty of folks willing to die in order to share their point of view with everyone around them...

I'll buy reduced risk of proliferation but the non-proliferation claim is a little dubious.

48 posted on 03/04/2019 6:55:04 PM PST by no-s (when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

ROTFLMAO!!!!!


49 posted on 03/04/2019 7:34:41 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: no-s

The fast critical mass is almost identical.


50 posted on 03/04/2019 7:35:26 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: no-s

Additionally, U-233 can be used in the simpler ‘gun’ initiator.


51 posted on 03/04/2019 7:41:05 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

In 12 years..../s


52 posted on 03/04/2019 9:56:53 PM PST by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
U-233 can be used in the simpler ‘gun’ initiator.

yeah, thus decreasing the time it would take to build and assemble a device. The bad guys just have to avoid detection long enough - and live long enough...

53 posted on 03/05/2019 9:41:40 AM PST by no-s (when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen; All
This story has advanced quite a bit in a month or so.

* Sec Rick Perry has greenlighted the following:

https://www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-perry-launches-versatile-test-reactor-project-modernize-nuclear-research-and

* Scott Adams of Dilbert fame has been all over the story.

* This one stuns me Murkowski of all people:

https://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/republican-news?ID=1E0EC688-A6CB-4EAB-803B-5C37152CB5EE

* The Author of this article in this posting is now Trumping no pun intended "The Green Nuclear Deal"

* And then, I am no fan of his, but Bill Gates is all over this like a bum on a baloney sandwich:

https://www.geekwire.com/2019/bill-gates-casts-enthusiastic-vote-senate-bill-speed-nuclear-energy-research/

No pun intended, but has this subject reached critical mass and when will the WH get out in front of it considering the jobs in the skilled trades this would generate.

54 posted on 04/04/2019 9:29:28 AM PDT by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Songs of Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson