I don’t know, the FBI didn’t come back and demand it... Obstruction of justice, but you really need to ask why the fibbies aren’t answering why they didn’t demand or seize.
Not prosecuted is different than being charged
Hillary's campaign chair knew that fact....yet after she lost, Podesta came charging out of the gate like Greased Lightning, galloping at breakneck speed, sweating it out, desperate to make bigtime loser Hillary look like a "victim."
DRUM ROLL PLEASE---Here's the very first evidence of the Democrats' fabricated Russian connection......about a month after Hillary lost.
=================================================
John Podesta Op-Ed: Washington Post post-election op-ed / FR POSTED by by ColdOne
PODESTA: The more we learn about the Russian plot to sabotage Hillary Clinton’s campaign and elect Donald Trump, and the failure of the FBI to adequately respond, the more shocking it gets. The former acting director of the CIA has called the Russian cyberattack “the political equivalent of 9/11.” Just as after the real 9/11, we need a robust, independent investigation into what went wrong inside the government and how to better protect our country in the future.
As the former chair of the Clinton campaign and a direct target of Russian hacking, I understand just how serious this is. So I was surprised to read in the New York Times that when the FBI discovered the Russian attack in September 2015, it failed to (Excerpt) Read more of Podesta at washingtonpost.com ...
======================================
The rest is lame history----Democrats then latched onto the Russian meme and ran with it. To the floundering Dems, they stupidly thought their ticket to electoral victory came from Russia.
They gave an answer. Just from memory, when pressed on this, the testimony was that 90+% of cyber-crime investigations are conducted WITHOUT accessing the affected system.
Ahh, found my post, 05/26/2017 6:08:04 AM PDT by Cboldt
It’s like the tail waggin the dog