Skip to comments.
New Graphene-Based Transistors Could Make Computers 1000 Times Faster
Wall Street Pit ^
| June 19, 2017
Posted on 06/22/2017 11:18:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This sounds great, but have they figured out a way to produce graphene in useful quantities cheaply?
21
posted on
06/23/2017 3:38:45 AM PDT
by
Flag_This
(Liberals are locusts.)
To: dfwgator
Now you can get your porn 1000 times faster.........and watch sex acts that are so fast, they finish before they start.
Speaking of quickies.......
22
posted on
06/23/2017 3:49:08 AM PDT
by
varon
(There's always room for one more on the hanging tree.....)
To: upchuck
Graphene could be a black girls name. Or Graphena. If she can run super fast then the name fits perfectly.
23
posted on
06/23/2017 3:53:39 AM PDT
by
tflabo
To: tflabo
24
posted on
06/23/2017 4:33:03 AM PDT
by
Recon Dad
(Force Recon Dad)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
As silicon based transistors are down to a few molecules, I gain to see how swapping to carbon will make that much difference. Specially seeing that the mechanical array to manipulate a magnetic field will be huge in size by comparison.
25
posted on
06/23/2017 4:40:10 AM PDT
by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: John W
If you want to continue to push technology forward, we need faster computers to be able to run bigger and better simulations for climate science
..
Of course that is # 1. If he means predicting the weather better, great. But I doubt thats it. Doesnt matter what hook the writer thinks he has to hang the desire for teraflops on. You and I know its really for making dynamite computer games. Not that I care about that . . .
26
posted on
06/23/2017 5:00:37 AM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which ‘liberalism’ coheres is that NOTHING ACTUALLY MATTERS except PR.)
To: Telepathic Intruder
Graphene is not two-dimensional. It has length width and height. A small dimension does not equate to no dimension, regardless of how much the ignorant press says so.
27
posted on
06/23/2017 5:41:48 AM PDT
by
Durus
(You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t care about computer speed. Give me faster and more reliable internet speed.
28
posted on
06/23/2017 6:04:55 AM PDT
by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Silver going up or does it need to be pushed down?
29
posted on
06/23/2017 6:10:16 AM PDT
by
Stentor
To: bgill
Yup, Everything’s moving to the cloud anyway so what good is a computer 1000 times faster if you are forced to use MS Office and Adobe Image editing software online?
30
posted on
06/23/2017 6:12:16 AM PDT
by
Pollard
(TRUMP 2016)
To: TChad
Science-minded university freshmen could do worse than to major in materials science with an emphasis on graphene.
...
That’s what graphene is good for, creating work for researchers, not much else.
31
posted on
06/23/2017 6:15:18 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Make America Great Again!)
To: dfwgator
And right there folks is the value prop...
To: All
Please excuse my ignorance, but does anyone know if graphene is as plentiful as silicon?
IOW - this is a great idea, but is graphene available and “manufactureable” in the quantities needed?
33
posted on
06/23/2017 6:36:47 AM PDT
by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
To: John W
Faster computers so they can get the answer wrong 1000x faster.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think the article is missing a paragraph. The one that says, "All the big problems have been solved with this new technology and all we need to do is get it into manufacturing."
Face-plant.
35
posted on
06/23/2017 6:58:07 AM PDT
by
super7man
(Madam Defarge, knitting, knitting, always knitting)
To: LibWhacker
Microsoft has an operating system that will slow those new computers to a crawl. Then the “Blue Screen of Death”!
To: School of Rational Thought
It’s way over the head of the sap that wrote this piece of nothing. 99% is about how it “could” save the world.
37
posted on
06/23/2017 8:12:54 AM PDT
by
aquila48
To: jonno
"Please excuse my ignorance, but does anyone know if graphene is as plentiful as silicon?" Very plentiful -- according to the Gorebull Wahrumists.
Maybe all the carbon they "sequester" would be a good graphene production feedstock... </SEMISARC>
38
posted on
06/23/2017 8:29:45 AM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's alias. "Islam": Allah's assassins. "Moderate Muslims": Islam's useful idiots.)
To: dfwgator
I wish! The puter I have now is nothing to brag about but it still works 10X faster than my interwebz connection. And that’s allegedly 20mgps download speed.
39
posted on
06/23/2017 11:47:32 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Investigate the Awan brothers and Wasserman Schultz)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson