Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: tired&retired

If “life,” liberty and the pursuit of happiness are “Inalienable Rights,” how can we have abortion and death penalty?

Generally, liberty is distinctly differentiated from freedom in that freedom is primarily, if not exclusively, the ability to do as one wills and what one has the power to do; whereas liberty concerns the absence of arbitrary restraints and takes into account the rights of all involved. As such, the exercise of liberty is subject to capability and limited by the rights of others.

The pursuit of happiness is defined as a fundamental right mentioned in the Declaration of Independence to freely pursue joy and live life in a way that makes you happy, as long as you don’t do anything illegal or violate the rights of others.

Wow, if you have “Liberty” and “Pursuit of Happiness” as long as you don’t do anything illegal or violate the rights of others, that leaves a pretty wide range of behaviors.


5 posted on 12/15/2016 11:01:24 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: tired&retired

That is what was and is intended


6 posted on 12/15/2016 11:06:13 AM PST by dirtymac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: tired&retired

In 1968, David Frost asked both Ronald Reagan to speak on the purpose of life. Ronald Reagan answered:

Well, of course, the biologist I suppose would say that like all breeds of animals, the basic instinct is to reproduce our kind, but I believe it’s inherent in the concept that created our country—and in the Judeo-Christian religion—that man is for individual fulfillment; for our religion is based on the idea not of any mass movement but of individual salvation. Each man must find his own salvation; I would think that our national purpose in this country—and we have lost sight of it too much in the last three decades—is to be free—to the limit possible with law and order, every man to be what God intended him to be.


7 posted on 12/15/2016 11:07:07 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: tired&retired

> Generally, liberty is distinctly differentiated from freedom in that freedom is primarily, if not exclusively, the ability to do as one wills and what one has the power to do; whereas liberty concerns the absence of arbitrary restraints and takes into account the rights of all involved. As such, the exercise of liberty is subject to capability and limited by the rights of others.

Liberty is freedom tempered by the requirements of humanity’s social nature.


12 posted on 12/15/2016 11:15:54 AM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: tired&retired

Our Liberty is based on our unalienable rights, correct?

The problem is that the government through progressivism, is constantly trying to erode the Bill of Rights, specifically our right to bear arms, property rights and due process rights.

So what is legal doesn’t necessarily comport with our liberty or our pursuit of happiness which is only possible truly with our possessing liberty.


13 posted on 12/15/2016 11:16:17 AM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: tired&retired
I see the death penalty as a form of societal self-defense, which is confirmed to me when a life prisoner kills another inmate or escapes and kills, or just kills or injures anyone.

If one is willing to accept a military or police that kills in defense, then one can accept the death penalty as "societal self-defense" to stop that killer from killing again. In my opinion.
30 posted on 12/15/2016 3:19:06 PM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson