Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: w1n1

Attacking America at Pearl Harbor - another not so good idea.


2 posted on 08/05/2016 7:48:21 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Last Dakotan
..and the Unintentional Jap suicide pistol

Jap Type 94...the original "glockcidental"-like discharge pistol.

3 posted on 08/05/2016 7:52:07 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan

No, it was a good idea.

They missed the fuel tanks.
They failed to return a third time that morning to destroy what was not already blown up.

They failed to STAY around Pearl harbor and get the carriers when they did come back on Monday or Tuesday that week.

That the carriers were out at sea on that Sunday morning could not be predicted - they tried, but failed to get the message out. Would Monday have been successful?

By the way, at that time, battleships WERE still the sea power. carriers were not yet proven. Close to be being effective, as Europe showed, but Brit carriers were NOT impressive early on! (As shown by the Brit carrier sunk by gunfire!) One swordfish hitting the Bismark rudder on one lucky shot after dozens of other torpedoes missed, does not a campaign make.

That the Brit carriers WERE successful in shallow water harbor attacks on moored battleships is what the japanese learned from the Med fighting.


10 posted on 08/05/2016 10:17:48 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson