Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex; yarddog
Geography, or what are known as natural frontiers, undoubtedly plays a considerable part in the division of nations. Geography is one of the crucial factors in history. Rivers have led races on; mountains have brought them to a halt. The former have favoured movement in history, whereas the latter have restricted it. Can one say, however, that as some parties believe, a nation's frontiers are written on the, map and that this nation has the right to judge what is necessary to round off certain contours, in order to reach such and such a mountain and such and such a river, which are thereby accorded a kind of a priori limiting faculty? I know of no doctrine which is more arbitrary or more fatal, for it allows one to justify any or every violence. First of all, is it the mountains or the rivers that we should regard as fanning these so-called natural frontiers? It is indisputable that the mountains separate, but the rivers tend rather to unify. Moreover, all mountains cannot divide up states. Which serve to separate and which do not? From Biarritz to Tornea, there is no one estuary which is more suited than any other to serving as a boundary marker.

14 posted on 02/10/2016 7:40:17 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: annalex

<>We have driven metaphysical and theological abstractions out of politics. What then remains? Man, with his desires and his needs. <>

Modern politics denies the special place of man in God’s creation and regards him as little more than a beast, whose needs are limited to physical comfort.


15 posted on 02/11/2016 1:38:27 AM PST by Jacquerie (To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson