Since they are not supporting Rubio, they may be more factual than biased Faux News Channel. I find myself watching CNN for unbalanced news more these days.
BTW, with the exception of the flubbed up candidate entrance, I thought ABC debate was best so far. Liked how they posted the questions posed under the candidate—so yo could see when the candidates were not answering.
I wouldn’t watch CNN exclusively. I don’t watch them at all, but even if I did, I’d watch for bias and discount it. But that only goes so far. It is no prophylactic against news that is being left out of their report.
Back in the seventies, I went to the Canadian National Exhibition in Toronto. The Soviets had an exhibit there in the form of a bookstore. There were plenty of English language books and the prices were quite low. One I particularly remember was called “British Foreign Policy in WWII.” I bought it and a handful of other books. I later realized why the prices were so low. It put Soviet propaganda into new hands easily.
Anyway, the foreign policy book was a history of WWII as seen from the Russian side. The facts, being indisputable, were presented straight. It was the spin, or the interpretation of the events, that ushered in Soviet ideology.
And that’s why I won’t watch MSNBC or CNN. Although they don’t usually deny the facts, they either leave them out or interpret them from a leftist standpoint. If you watch that crap long enough, you’ll get mentally infected.