Skip to comments.CON Law Restricts Patient Access to Critical Health Care Services
Posted on 02/02/2016 9:37:10 AM PST by MichCapCon
New research from the Virginia-based Mercatus Center indicates that schemes to ration health care services through certificate-of-need requirements â such as those imposed in Michigan â increase the difficulty of getting access to health care services while doing nothing to reduce their costs.
A CON law restricts the ability of health care providers to expand or open new facilities, or to acquire powerful diagnostic tools. Providers must first get permission from a government commission. Some members of that commission may represent the incumbent facilities against which the new entrant would like to compete.
CON laws supposedly help keep medical costs low by avoiding overinvestment in facilities and expensive technologies. A second rationale offered in their defense is that they help the poor by requiring providers to provide charity care as a condition of obtaining the required approval.
Among other restrictions, Michiganâs law requires existing or would-be providers to get permission for new or even replacement imaging equipment used to take CT, MRI, or PET images. The multistep CON process requires applicants file a letter of intent, an application, plus additional requested information and then wait 45 to 150 days, depending on the type of review. They must also pay fees that range from $3,000 to $15,000, based on the cost of the project.
The Mercatus research found that CON laws negatively affect independent providers of imaging services. These businesses may be kept out of the imaging market by having their application denied, or because they assume this will happen and donât bother to apply in the first place.
Hospitals, meanwhile, have several advantages over their would-be competitors in obtaining the required certificates. Not surprisingly, when CON laws exist, hospitals dominate the market for imaging services. They are more politically popular than independent providers and can absorb application costs more easily, making it possible for them to acquire enough equipment to perform as many scans as hospitals in states without CON laws. Hospital associations also have the financial resources to mount lengthy legal challenges to keep anti-competitive regulation in place.
CON laws play no positive role in public health or health care provider quality. They also donât help the poor, because while providers who get the required permissions are supposed to increase charity care, the logic of cross-subsidization is ineffective at making them do so. The law is effective at one thing, though, and that is shrinking the pool of services available to all Michigan residents.
Congress repealed federal CON laws in 1987, after which many states rolled back their own versions. The Federal Trade Commission has since issued official statements calling for the repeal of all state CON laws. The commission says that they prevent efficiently functioning health care markets and can harm consumers by posing barriers to expanding the supply of providers. As a result, they put limits on consumer choice and inhibit innovation.
Michiganâs Legislature should repeal the CON scheme altogether. If the Mercatus report does not lead to its abolition, at the least it shows that the scheme does not live up to its own logic.
In a state that would like to see its health care services sector become a magnet for consumers in other states and nations, it makes much more sense to allow the forces of supply and demand to optimize the availability of health care tools, services and innovations for all of us.
These laws are put in place sith the goal of killing people by delay of treatment and diagnostics. IE death by denial of care/services.
Like what Canadians used to flee to come down here for treatment and such that they could pay for, and get, quickly.
While that may be the effect. it is certainly not the goal.
The goal is restraint of trade and stifling competition. The notion that is keeps costs down by preventing “overinvestment” is ludicrous.
I am reminded of an interview from a British source from the late 1990s.
A Brit gentlemen...mid-50’s...had a serious knee issue. It took six months to get the final expert to agree that knee operation was necessary. However, he could only recommend it to the regional council.
I left out one significant factor....the patient weighed in the range of 275 pounds.
The regional council picked up the folder and the recommendation for the knee option. It was a go except for factor. They wanted him to lose 75 pounds before they’d authorize the operation.
The guy went into disbelief. He was in intense pain and there was no walk to walk or exercise with this type of situation. If he starved himself....he might be able to accomplish that but he just wasn’t up for that challenge.
So, no benefit would occur, or operation. His local doctor noted that he write up all the prescriptions necessary for pain-killers for the rest of his life. That’s the comical side of this story.
He told this story to a friend at a pub who was Indian. He had a cousin in India who knew some medical folks. Within a week...a quote came from India for a reasonable price. I think with airfare, a private room at a upscale clinic, food, and the operation....it came to around $5,000. He pulled the money from his pocket...flew over....did the surgery and never looked back.
In the end, all this gov’t interference will create one single thing...a massive private and cheap deal in Cuba where you get five star healthcare for forty-percent of what you’d pay in the US. Toss in a bottle per day of rum, some cheap Cuban nurse attending you around the clock, and no one is going to complain.
No that is the goal. The people its aimed at are sick people who use more resources than they pay in for, as far as the liberal overlords are. They tend to have poorer qaly scores.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.