Please cite relevant case law proving that there’s such a thing as “naturalized by statute” at birth as distinct from “natural born”. I’m unaware of the law recognizing such a distinction.
There isn’t such a thing. It is just a crazy birther claim.
According to FReeper cboldt, 100% of case law says that.
You can search forever and come up empty. There isn't one.
Here's the relevant statutory definition of naturalization:
8 US Code 1101 - Definitions
(23) The term "naturalization" means the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever.
notes: 'after birth,' not at birth, and 'by any means whatsoever' including both individual naturalization and collective naturalization - both of which only concern persons already living, i.e. after birth.
If there were not a difference, WHY did the Framers specifically use “Natural Born Citizen” for president and vice president, when ALL OTHER references in the constitution are simply CITIZEN?Why bother if there were not a difference?
Read Vattel,Law of Nations and see the wording. Just google it! Both parents Citizens and born on the soil.
Rogers v Bellei
The Naturalization Act of 1934