![](http://s9.postimg.org/asf1vjyrz/rerun_2016_2.jpg"/)
Posted on 04/02/2015 5:23:23 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey
Given the seemingly deadbeat field of likely Democrat Presidential Candidates would that party dare reach back into the past...and nominate Revrunt Jesse Marblemouth Jackson?
Don’t forget the “aging hippies”. They will vote for the A&B* Vietnam veteran/quisling by the droves.
*aiding and abetting the enemy
No
I’ll have to ponder that one for a while...
The entertainment possibilites would be monumental...
“Every Democrat I know knows he’s a crook. It may go unsaid ... but they know”.
youd think that that very fact would make him a shoo in!!?
That ticket would facilitate the use of RACESS..SEXIST..as the New ready “response” to any and all criticism, I suspect..
Of course, I'm assuming a modicum of sanity to be involved - probably a false assumption on my part.
If he runs, I sure hope the MSM quits using the term “Reverend” in his name. Neither he nor Al Sharpton deserve the title “Rev”. Neither completed divinity school, neither has ever had a congregation, and neither has ever had a church. Al was “ordained” at age 10 by a DC preacher, and he’s maintained the lie ever since. Both men are professional pot stirrers and wouldn’t even be a dust mote in history if you look at the “good” they’ve brought to the world. From Tawana Brawley, the Duke Five, to Ferguson...these clowns have always come down on the wrong side of the truth, but never apologize for the damage they do. They should be driven from the planet.
KERRY GORE...OR GORE KERRY?
Gore Kerry has a certain sound to it..but then again KERRY GORE could be somewhat amusing if spelled Phonetically,,?
Jackson, Sharpton, Farakhan were all thought of one time or another by the radical left. Problem was none of them were polished enough or smart enough to stand behind a microphone, read a teleprompter and recite the message.
Obama was. Plus, having an Islamic/Marxist background from birth, he basically fit the suit. The left needed someone who was bulletproof against scrutiny while at the same time able to forward the agenda.
those reasons to eliminate them from consideration may sound good to us but given the current administrations core values...either sharpton or jackson might just be the perfect follow up...to the Obie Regime!
Alas, I fear you are right. It seems most voters are lucky they can fog a mirror without gov’t help.
Haven’t we done the Gore-Kerry side before? Maybe they should switch it around and go for the Kerry-Gore aspect?
Reality tells me it will be one or the other, if either one enters the fray. In the end, they will NOT team up. Next, I don’t see Gore coming into the campaign unless Obamugabe (AKA: ValJar) pushes him in. Hillary, according to the media, is still viable. Let’s see what shakes out.
Never mind government transparency...I question the media’s political transparency.
McKinney Gore?
Jackson Lee Kerry?
They need a woman on the ticket if theyre to make use of the War On Women...meme!!
OOOOOOOO...
you have headed down a previously unexplored rabbit-hole.
...well, unexplored by Alice!
Where is that googly-eyed GIF of SJLee?
![](http://s14.postimg.org/fm9x7ymy9/rerun_2016_OLDIE.jpg"/)
To quote hitlery, “what difference does it make, now”? None considering nobama pissed in the dem election well so thoroughly that no dem will get elected in 2016 and no black will be POTUS for the next 100 years.
Won’t happen. He has no governing experience, no experience as an elected official, and no private business experience. All he has is his own shakedown foundation. Plus, he’s already in his 70s, if I’m not mistaken.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.