Posted on 03/10/2015 12:42:26 PM PDT by rightistight
Wouldn’t Wild Bill’s server domain be something like Long Dong’s Server.
I’d it was out In place cow WJC. Who paid for it? Federal funds? Then it belongs to the people and is not private property. That IMO would determine who and how control and seizure is established
What’s Webb Hubble’s daughter doing there?
Yes, according to reports, this server was set up just before she took office as SoS. To square that with today's claim that it was set up for Bill while he was president, we need to listen to what Hillary herself said, not what Shep Smith and the others thought she said.
Hillary said it was set up for "President Clinton." She did not say "during his time as President," or "when he was president." She was playing the vile, arrogant Clinton parsing game, hoping to bestow legitimacy on the server by virtue of it having been set up for a sitting president. (And the media heard it just like she intended.)
The reason she went for that sleight of hand, imho, was to perceptually backdate the installation of the server, disassociating it from her SoS start date. Instead of reflecting the clearly calculated intent to evade record retention laws, she's planting the idea of, oh, well, since we had it, why not use it?
On the other hand, why would she go to the trouble to split that hair when she's lying her ample ass off about everything else?
My word people...you have to parse what the bent one said...
He sent only two emails, doesn’t mean he didn’t read PIAPS emails...
see...so they weren’t lying...
It must be a “right wing conspiracy”....
Good analysis...
Nobody parses language like a Clinton, that’s for certain!
If there was an inlay of the unapproved non-compliant ebony on the server, the EPA would fast-rope in a SWAT Team.
If Bill Clinton has people writing, sending, and reading email for him but doesn't do that himself, it creates the atmosphere of ambiguity and denial that he and Hillary have always thrived in.
If it suits Bill's purpose or Hillary's, Bill never sent an email, because he never did so personally. If it suits their purpose, Bill sends emails all the time, because he pays people to do just that.
I'm guessing some adult beverages were consumed...too.
Nope just sandwiches and pizza. Lunch shop
Bill Clinton Accidentally Proves Wife is Lying about Contents of Emails, Lying at Presser
“The server contains personal communications between my husband and me,” she declared. “The server will remain private.”
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/03/10/bill-clinton-still-doesnt-use-email/
Check out article, and comment # 17, also other comments.
Thanks, Maggie.
Whatever, Mr. Attorney.
” Bill Clinton “does not use email.” During his entire life, he has only sent two emai”
What a load of cr@p. If there EVER was someone that would use email, twitter and ESPECIALLY Instagram, the Bent One would just to set up his assignations.
Only “thousands” of emails? I can get that many in a week.
Hillary Says “Trust Me”
March 10, 2015
Mrs. Clinton’s statement at the United Nations was vintage Hillary. She was self-righteous, secretive, arrogant, angry, stubborn, legalistic and unconvincing in her replies.
But underscoring her comments is the fact that her entire defense rests one implausible premise: that she can be trusted.
• She won’t allow an examination of her server. We have to trust her that none of the emails concerned classified material.
• She wouldn’t consider allowing an outsider to review the emails and decide if the correct ones had been turned over?
• She would not tell who made the decision on which emails to turn over to the State Department.
• She revealed that she destroyed half of the emails, the ones she, not an impartial reviewer, considered not related to official business.
Normally, this strategy of concealment and delay would be effective as it has proven to be in all past Clinton scandals. Our patience with the questions and the prosecutor will become frayed and we will move on and forget it ever happened.
But this scandal has a time limit, unlike all her others. If it is not resolved until after the summer, we will not simply wait longer. The Democrats will demand that there be an understudy to Hillary. Facing the possibility that the emails, when fully disclosed and the server, when subpoenaed, will prove incriminating is too dangerous a gamble to play during a presidential election. The Democrats will demand certainty and only have confidence in her candidacy if she has met that standard. Otherwise, the pressure to put Elizabeth Warren, at least, on the ballot to be an alternative if needed will mount.
Hillary’s contention is that she did comply with the State Department regulations because the recipients of the emails kept their correspondence on government servers. This contention belies the fact that in so doing, she made it almost impossible to discover what was in the emails. What was a Congressional committee to do? Subpoena every government employee to determine if they received any of Hillary’s emails?
Previously, Hillary’s office had indicated that 90% of the emails were sent to State Department employees in whose systems they are presumably stored. But what about the other 10%. If they were sent to non-State Department employees or even foreigners, there would be no record.
Nor was her answer that she was motivated by convenience to consolidate all her personal emails with those which concern public business at all credible.
But it is very simple to maintain two email accounts in one device. No extra space in her pocketbook needed.
Was this performance designed to make us trust her? Is there anyone in the United States that believes that she, alone among the Cabinet, chose to e mail on a private server because she didn’t want to carry around two devices? She who travels with aides on special planes and rarely carries her own luggage or even her large designer purses?
Who would not harbor suspicions that convenience was not her priority and that secrecy was.
How will this affair play out? The State Department will turn over the selected emails to Congressman Trey Gowdy’s committee. He will find that many of those that have been deleted were relevant and should have been produced. A push pull will ensue and, eventually, we will see all the emails and Hillary will take an enormous hit.
And, if Warren isn’t on the ballot, so will the entire Democratic Party.
INCONVENIENT FACTOID All of Hillary's electronics were "government-issue" -- meaning they were paid for by taxpayers. She dooesn't get to keep government property. Ergo.....
TAXPAYERS DEMAND TO KNOW:
<><> all govt-issue electronics are supposed to be returned ....did Hillary return her electronics?
<><> If she did not return her electronics when she left state....we demand she return them now.
<><> an official record of her tax-paid electronics exists...OMB should have the details.
=============================================
FREEPER ACTION: Call your Congressman---demand to know the details of Hillary's electronics.
At the 3:44 to 4 min mark she tells she had a blackberry and ipad, iphone, mini-ipad.
13:24 Minutes
Hillary Clinton: It Was More Convenient To Use Just One Device -Hillary’s Emails - Steyn - Hannity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYR91STn_Ys
Hillary was at a Cali tech conference-—explains why she eagerly ticked off her collection of devices.
For the Clintons, the lies just trip over each other.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.