[Cincinnatus.45-70]

But why is the review written using Marxist terminology?

[Sherman Logan]

Radical is a perfectly good word. No reason why Marxists should be allowed to appropriate it for their exclusive use.

[x_plus_one]

Land Tenure reformists in Scotland ( The most feudal country in the west) use socialist terminology to their detriment as well.

http://www.amazon.com/Andy-Wightman/e/B0034OO3HA/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1

Private property rights are an endangered species in the UK and the UN would do the same to us by way of Agenda 21.

[OneWingedShark]

But why is the review written using Marxist terminology?

Maybe it's an attempt to not let the other side define the discussion; maybe it's the other side equating dissent from government to evil.
I don't know.

[9thLife]

But why is the review written using Marxist terminology?

This misapplication -- or redefinition -- or radicalization, if you will -- of language isn't merely something journalists titillate one another (and torture everyone else) with. It has seeped into the mind of the generation now starting a career making any communication beyond the most superficial nearly impossible; and ensuring that the young mind interprets history through a Marxist filter. So I have observed. And since language is the medium of the mind, the ramifications for the proper intellectual formation of this generation are ominous indeed.