To: dignitasnews
"Most people in most cities don't have a bunch of choices for the internet they have one choice and because that choice is a local monopoly they can charge too much and deliver too littleI don't think this is even true anymore.
3 posted on
11/11/2014 10:02:40 PM PST by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: GeronL
Well, what the hell. The left thinks race relations are at pre-1950’s levels, so why shouldn’t they think internet options are circa 1998?
To: GeronL
Three major bills that congress passed dealing with cable television. One in the mid 80’s, and two in the 90’s. Each time one of these bills were passed, cable rates went up. Each time they said, “Increases in cable rates would be greatly reduced.” They said the same thing with the ACA. “It will reduce the cost.” The federal government needs to stay out of the internet business, or we will see a massive increase in our internet cost also.
6 posted on
11/11/2014 10:46:45 PM PST by
political1
(Love your neighbors)
To: GeronL
Explain, since one would have to set the bar implausibly low to get “alternatives”.
7 posted on
11/11/2014 11:14:46 PM PST by
setha
(It is past time for the United States to take back what the world took away.)
To: GeronL
I believe the liberal meme on this is changing from having “options” to being a “free” utility to certain entitled classes. The ability to conduct almost any type of business transaction in the future will depend on internet access. Hence not having access will be discriminatory. Of course we know it is all about control and power.
9 posted on
11/12/2014 3:40:12 AM PST by
buckalfa
(Long time caller --- first time listener.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson