Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: G Larry

In many cities and towns, unless you fear for your life, you are not permitted to fire you gun within the city limits. So a warning shot is not legal, because if you feared for your life you would have been aiming center mass.

So, Larry is right. If you choose to fire a warning shot, make sure it is a situation where firing to kill is warranted, and say you were shooting to kill and missed.


5 posted on 10/23/2014 9:46:14 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (Health Care Haiku: If You Have a Right / To the Labor I Provide / I Must Be Your Slave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Haiku Guy
While it is splitting hairs...one technically does not shoot to kill as much as one shoots to halt a deadly threat and sometimes the perpetrator of that threat is killed.
6 posted on 10/23/2014 9:52:54 AM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Haiku Guy

“In many cities and towns, unless you fear for your life, you are not permitted to fire you gun within the city limits. So a warning shot is not legal, because if you feared for your life you would have been aiming center mass.”

That is a logical fallacy. Shooting center mass is not the only possible response to fearing for your life.


7 posted on 10/23/2014 9:56:13 AM PDT by marktwain (The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson