To: taildragger
“aggressive investigative journalism you courageously employed 42 years ago”
She shows her naiveté once again. What they did was not aggressive journalism. Anyone who believes that Woodward & Bernstein were some great investigators is clueless.
To: Henry Hnyellar
She shows her naiveté once again. What they did was not aggressive journalism. Anyone who believes that Woodward & Bernstein were some great investigators is clueless.You bring up a good point I hadn't though of. They had an agenda as I sort of noted, get Nixon as he was with Joe McCarthy. Perhaps she was being magnanimous to them, something many have not reciprocated.
33 posted on
07/27/2014 4:47:32 PM PDT by
taildragger
(Not my Circus, Not my Monkey ( Boy does that apply to DC...))
To: Henry Hnyellar
She shows her naiveté once again. What they did was not aggressive journalism. Anyone who believes that Woodward & Bernstein were some great investigators is clueless. That's not naivete'. It's called "tact".
34 posted on
07/27/2014 4:49:14 PM PDT by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.<p>)
To: Henry Hnyellar
You are right. They lied, obfuscated and pointed fingers to bring down the prosecutor of Alger Hiss. Nothing more.
To: Henry Hnyellar
Ah, another man who has read Silent Coup.
40 posted on
07/27/2014 5:21:59 PM PDT by
section9
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson